Legislation, medicine, and politics: care for gender diverse youth

Abstract

Purpose of review: A recent increase in legislation in the United States prohibiting gender-affirming care (GAC) for transgender youth follows a wave of its politicization despite support from all pertinent mainstream medical associations. This review describes the standards of GAC for transgender youth, the origins of legislation prohibiting this care, a review of current legislation in the United States and a discussion on the impact on patients, providers, and the medical field.

Recent findings: A critical evaluation of historical parallels and current organizations supporting this legislation reveals it stems not from concerns within the medical field but from political and religious interests. This intrusion sets a dangerous precedent, undermining evidence-based medicine, providers' ability to practice according to standards of care, and patients' and guardians' autonomy and medical decision-making. This wave of antitrans rhetoric and legislation has resulted in threats to health providers and hospitals, 'moral distress" in providers, and migration of providers and patients from hostile states.

Summary: Similar to antiabortion legislation, these legislative efforts will likely result in negative health outcomes and worsening disparities. The medical community must confront these forces directly through an understanding of the political and structural forces at play and adopting strategies to leverage collective power.