Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;100(6):1202-1211.
doi: 10.1007/s11524-023-00789-w. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

A Good Farewell? Positive Exits from Federal Housing Assistance and Lower Acute Healthcare Utilization

Alastair I Matheson  1   2 , Danny V Colombara  3   4 , Annie Pennucci  5 , Andy Chan  6 , Tyler Shannon  5 , Megan Suter  3 , Amy A Laurent  3
Affiliations

A Good Farewell? Positive Exits from Federal Housing Assistance and Lower Acute Healthcare Utilization

Alastair I Matheson et al. J Urban Health. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Little is known regarding the health outcomes of people who exit from housing assistance and if that experience varies by the circumstances under which a person exits. We asked two questions: (1) does the type of exit from housing assistance matter for healthcare utilization? And (2) how does each exit type compare to remaining in housing assistance in terms of healthcare utilization? This retrospective cohort study of 5550 exits between 2012 and 2018 used data from two large, urban public housing authorities in King County, Washington. Exposures were exiting from housing assistance and type of exit (positive, neutral, negative). Outcomes were emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and well-child checks (among those aged < 6) in the year following exit from housing assistance. After adjustment for demographics and baseline healthcare utilization, people with positive exits had 26% (95% confident interval: 6-39%) lower odds of having 1 + ED visits in the year following exit than people with negative exits and 20% (95% CI: 6-31%) lower odds than those who continued receiving housing assistance. Neutral and negative exits did not differ substantially from each other, and both exit types appear to be detrimental to health, with higher levels of ED visits and hospitalizations and lower levels of well-child checks. Why people exit from housing assistance matters. Those with negative exits experience poorer outcomes and efforts should be made to both prevent this kind of exit and mitigate its impact.

Keywords: Health care utilization; Public housing; Social determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Regression results for health outcomes by exit type
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Regression results for health outcomes comparing exit types with remaining in housing assistance
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Shaw M. Housing and public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:397–418. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krieger J, Higgins DL. Housing and health: time again for public health action. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(5):758–68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quensell ML, Taira DA, Seto TB, Braun KL, Sentell TL. “I need my own place to get better”: patient perspectives on the role of housing in potentially preventable hospitalizations. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(2):784–797. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2017.0074. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wright B, Li G, Weller M, Vartanian K. Health in housing: exploring the intersection between housing and health care. Portland, OR: Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CORE); 2016.
    1. Pollack CE, Blackford AL, Du S, Deluca S, Thornton RLJ, Herring B. Association of receipt of a housing voucher with subsequent hospital utilization and spending. JAMA. 2019;322(21):2115–2124. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.17432. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources