Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Jan;57(1):38-43.
doi: 10.1136/hrt.57.1.38.

Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of severity of coarctation of the aorta and interruption of the aortic arch

Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of severity of coarctation of the aorta and interruption of the aortic arch

A B Houston et al. Br Heart J. 1987 Jan.

Abstract

Doppler ultrasound was used to investigate 48 infants and children (age 2 days-16 years, weight 1.0-58 kg) with aortic arch abnormalities. In only 38 of the 42 with an important coarctation was an increased blood flow velocity from the distal arch demonstrated. In three with interruption of the aortic arch an increased velocity recorded from the region of the distal arch was thought to represent ductal flow. There was little difference between the peak to peak and instantaneous maximum gradients in the 20 patients with important coarctation in whom direct pressure measurements both proximal and distal to the obstruction were made at catheterisation. There were poor agreements between Doppler and measured peak to peak and instantaneous gradients in the 17 patients found to have both an increased velocity and important coarctation. It is concluded that although an increased blood flow velocity in the distal arch is usually demonstrated in coarctation this may not occur with severe obstruction. Furthermore, the maximum velocity is not related to the anatomical severity of the obstruction and the Doppler estimate of pressure drop in coarctation may not even reliably predict that measured at catheterisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Physiol. 1970 Feb;218(2):437-47 - PubMed
    1. Acta Med Scand. 1977 Jan;201(1-2):83-8 - PubMed
    1. Br Heart J. 1978 Feb;40(2):131-40 - PubMed
    1. Br Heart J. 1984 Sep;52(3):278-83 - PubMed
    1. Br Heart J. 1984 Nov;52(5):552-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources