Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 11;7(1):81-91.
doi: 10.3233/KCA-230006. eCollection 2023.

Antigenic targets in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Antigenic targets in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Nicholas R Schindler et al. Kidney Cancer. .

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but most patients still do not receive a long-term benefit from these therapies, and many experience off-target, immune-related adverse effects. RCC is also different from many other ICI-responsive tumors, as it has only a modest mutation burden, and total neoantigen load does not correlate with ICI response. In order to improve the efficacy and safety of immunotherapies for RCC, it is therefore critical to identify the antigens that are targeted in effective anti-tumor immunity. In this review, we describe the potential classes of target antigens, and provide examples of previous and ongoing efforts to investigate and target antigens in RCC, with a focus on clear cell histology. Ultimately, we believe that a concerted antigen discovery effort in RCC will enable an improved understanding of response and resistance to current therapies, and lay a foundation for the future development of "precision" antigen-directed immunotherapies.

Keywords: Renal cell carcinoma; T cell receptor; cancer vaccine; chimeric antigen receptor T cell; neoantigen; tumor antigen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D.A.B. reports honoraria from LM Education/Exchange Services, advisory board fees from Exelixis and AVEO, equity in Fortress Biotech (subsidiary), personal fees from Schlesinger Associates, Cancer Expert Now, Adnovate Strategies, MDedge, CancerNetwork, Catenion, OncLive, Cello Health BioConsulting, PWW Consulting, Haymarket Medical Network, Aptitude Health, ASCO Post/Harborside, Targeted Oncology, AbbVie, and research support from Exelixis and AstraZeneca, outside of the submitted work. N.R.S has no conflict of interest to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the cancer immunity cycle (as described by Chen and Mellman). The seven steps of the cancer immunity cycle are displayed in a cyclic format. In the first step, tumor cells undergo immunogenic cell death. Death of the malignant cells allows antigens to be released into the microenvironment. These antigens are taken up by antigen presenting cells, such as naïve dendritic cells; trafficked to lymph tissue; and processed with the internal antigen processing machinery. This involves proteosomes cleaving antigens into smaller peptides and presenting them on HLA complexes. Activated antigen presenting cells display antigens to prime and activate naïve T cells. The activated T cells differentiate into specific classes depending on factors such as co-stimulatory signals. Activated T cells migrate back to the site of the tumor via trafficking signals and infiltrate the tumor microenvironment. Once inside the tumor, T cells may recognize and kill malignant cells, thereby restarting the cycle.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Antigen Classes. Antigens may be categorized as HLA-restricted or surface antigens. HLA-restricted antigens include all proteins generated within the cell that are processed by antigen presenting machinery. Surface antigens are a subset of proteins that are presented on the surface of the cell. Each class of antigen has been targeted by antigen-directed therapies in a personalized or universal basis. Personalized therapies are unique to each patient and have the opportunity to create a deeper immune response to malignancy. Universal therapies are not unique to an individual patient, but are cost effective and available immediately as an “off-the-shelf” therapy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Demasure S, et al.. Overall survival improvement in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma between 2000 and 2020: a retrospective cohort study. Acta Oncol. 2022;61(1):22–9. - PubMed
    1. Motzer RJ, et al.. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(14):1277–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Motzer RJ, et al.. Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(12):1103–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rini BI, et al.. Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(12):1116–27. - PubMed
    1. Motzer R, et al.. Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(14):1289–300. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources