Evaluation of patient satisfaction using the validated French version of the SSIPI questionnaire after inflatable penile implantation
- PMID: 38014798
- DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad154
Evaluation of patient satisfaction using the validated French version of the SSIPI questionnaire after inflatable penile implantation
Abstract
Background: Penile prothesis (PP) is a recommended treatment for erectile dysfunction that is refractory to less invasive treatments, but there are few validated tools to assess patient satisfaction.
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction after PP implantation using the French Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI) questionnaire.
Methods: Demographic, clinical, and perioperative data were collected from all consecutive patients who underwent PP implantation in our center between 2016 and 2021. The French SSIPI questionnaire was completed during a telephone call with each patient by an independent investigator.
Outcomes: A good functional result was considered when the total SSIPI score was >48, corresponding to a score of >3 for each item.
Results: The median global SSIPI score for the cohort was 66 (interquartile range [IQR], 60-73), and 53 (89.8%) patients were satisfied. The appearance of the penis with the PP was the item that had the lowest score for satisfaction (median score 23 [IQR, 19-26]), while the patients reported almost no pain (median score 10 [IQR, 9-10]). When patients with a total score of ≤64 were compared with those with a score of >64, PP size was significantly greater in the group with better functional results (P = .03).
Clinical implications: Assessment of patient satisfaction with a PP is important because this is the main criterion used to judge the success of surgery.
Strengths and limitations: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the satisfaction of patients with a PP using the French-validated version of SSIPI questionnaire. However, patients came from a single center and the population size was small.
Conclusion: Almost 90% of patients with a PP were satisfied with the device when satisfaction was assessed using the SSIPI questionnaire.
Keywords: assessment; erectile dysfunction; outcomes; penile; prosthesis; questionnaire; satisfaction.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society of Sexual Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthesis Insertion in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.Sex Med Rev. 2022 Jul;10(3):468-477. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Feb 24. Sex Med Rev. 2022. PMID: 35221231
-
Penile Prosthesis Surgery: Current Recommendations From the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine.J Sex Med. 2016 Apr;13(4):489-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Mar 25. J Sex Med. 2016. PMID: 27045255
-
Penile length after penile implant surgery is determined by stretched penile length before surgery.J Sex Med. 2025 Jan 3;22(1):165-169. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae153. J Sex Med. 2025. PMID: 39539221
-
Long-term outcomes after plaque excision grafting for Peyronie's disease and subanalysis of patients who undergo the procedure despite preoperative counseling against it.J Sex Med. 2024 Jan 30;21(2):163-168. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad164. J Sex Med. 2024. PMID: 38087916
-
Penile Prosthesis Implantation Combined With Grafting Techniques in Patients With Peyronie's Disease and Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.Sex Med Rev. 2022 Jul;10(3):451-459. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Jul 1. Sex Med Rev. 2022. PMID: 34219005
Cited by
-
Reservoir placement options: a state of the art review.Int J Impot Res. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01082-x. Online ahead of print. Int J Impot Res. 2025. PMID: 40355695 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous