In Vivo Analysis of Porous Bioactive Silicon Carbide Scaffold for Craniofacial Bone Augmentation
- PMID: 38014939
- DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009864
In Vivo Analysis of Porous Bioactive Silicon Carbide Scaffold for Craniofacial Bone Augmentation
Abstract
Background: Bone augmentation is a vital area of research because of its high clinical demand and the reported complications associated with the available biomaterials. Purpose: The study assess the role of decellurized skeletal muscle (DSM) when combined with synthesized porous bioactive silicon carbide (SiC) ceramic and evaluated its ability to augment bone calvaria in a rat model.
Material and methods: Eighteen rats were divided into 2 groups; group 1 (n=9), SiC discs (10 × 0.2 mm) pre-treated with 20% NaOH were placed as an onlay grafts on calvarial bone. Meanwhile, in group 2 (n=9), SiC discs pre-treated with 20% NaOH (10 × 0.2 mm) were covered with DSM. After 12 weeks, the grafted tissues were harvested and examined using cone-beam computed tomography, mechanical testing, and histologic analysis.
Results: Cone-beam computed tomography for group 2 showed more radio-opacity for the remnant of SiC compared with native bone. The surface area and volume of radio-opacity were 2.48 mm 2 ± 1.6 and 14.9 ± 7.8 mm 3 , respectively. The estimated quantitative average surface area of the radio-opacity for group 1 and volume were 2.55 mm 2 ± (Sd=3.7) and 11.25 ± (Sd=8.9), respectively. Mechanically, comparable values of the flexural strength and statistically significant higher modulus of elasticity of calvaria in group 1 compared with group 2 and control ( P <0.001). Histologically, group 2 region of woven bone was seen close to the lamellar bone (native bone), and there was immature bone present near the implanted SiC.
Conclusion: The tested construct made of SiC/DSM has potential to osteointegrate into native bone, making it a suitable material for bone augmentation.
Copyright © 2023 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Conflict of interest statement
The author report noconflicts of interests.
References
-
- Chim H, Gosain AK. Biomaterials in craniofacial surgery: experimental studies and clinical application. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:29–33
-
- Kwarcinski J, Boughton P, Ruys A, et al. Cranioplasty and craniofacial reconstruction: a review of implant material, manufacturing method and infection risk. Appl Sci 2017;7:276–293
-
- Ilan DI, Ladd AL. Bone graft substitutes. Operat Tech Plastic Reconstruct Surg 2002;9:151–160
-
- Filgueiras MRT, La Torre G, Hench LL. Solution effects on the surface reactions of three bioactive glass compositions. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:1485–1493
-
- Hench LL. Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 1991;74:1487–1510
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources