Knot holding capacity of two different high-strength sutures-a biomechanical analysis
- PMID: 38015209
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-06041-z
Knot holding capacity of two different high-strength sutures-a biomechanical analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The number of seven required throws per knot was previously reported as providing sufficient security against slippage. A novel high-strength suture featuring dynamic tightening may allow for throw number reduction without compromising stability. The aims of this study were to (1) investigate the influence of the throw number and the effect of different ambient conditions on the knot security of two different high-strength sutures, and (2) compare their biomechanical competence.
Methods: Two sutures (FiberWire (FW) and DynaCord (DC)) were considered for preparing alternating surgical knots. The specimens were stratified for exposure to different media during biomechanical testing-namely air (dry), saline solution (wet), and fat (fatty-wet). A monotonic tensile ramp loading to failure was applied in each test run. For each suture and ambient condition, seven specimens with three to seven throws each were tested (n = 7), evaluating their slippage and ultimate force to failure. The minimum number of throws preventing suture unraveling was determined for each suture type and condition.
Results: For each suture type and condition, failure occurred via rupture in all specimens for the following minimum number of throws: FW-dry-7, wet-7, fatty-wet-7; DC-dry-6, wet-4, fatty-wet-5. When applying seven throws, FW demonstrated significantly larger slippage (6.5 ± 2.2 mm) versus DC (3.5 ± 0.4 mm) in wet (p = 0.004) but not in dry and fatty-wet conditions (p ≥ 0.313).
Conclusions: The lower number of throws providing knot security of DC versus FW in the more realistic wet and fatty-wet conditions indicates that the novel DC suture may allow to decrease the foreign body volume and save surgical time without compromising the biomechanical competence.
Keywords: Biomechanical test; DynaCord; FiberWire; High-strength suture; Rupture; Slippage; Throw number.
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical evaluation of double-stranded knot configurations in high-strength sutures and tapes.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2867-2876. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02566-z. Epub 2024 Jun 22. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024. PMID: 38907860
-
How many knots are necessary to achieve knot security of two high strength suture tapes? A biomechanical comparative analysis.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 16;145(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05638-2. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 39680173
-
Influence of testing conditions on primary stability of arthroscopic knot tying for rotator cuff repair: slippery when wet?Arthroscopy. 2011 Dec;27(12):1628-36. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.031. Epub 2011 Sep 25. Arthroscopy. 2011. PMID: 21945675
-
High-Tensile Strength Suture Materials in Orthopaedics.JBJS Rev. 2025 Mar 25;13(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00193. eCollection 2025 Mar 1. JBJS Rev. 2025. PMID: 40130941 Review.
-
Knot Security 101: A Comprehensive Practical Review to Optimal Knot Configuration, Pulling Direction, Throw Count, and Tail Length.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Aug 9;12(8):e6047. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006047. eCollection 2024 Aug. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 39139841 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Biomechanical evaluation of cerclage wiring in plated tibia fractures using human and synthetic specimens.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 11;51(1):227. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02894-8. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025. PMID: 40498124 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical evaluation of double-stranded knot configurations in high-strength sutures and tapes.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2867-2876. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02566-z. Epub 2024 Jun 22. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024. PMID: 38907860
-
New dynamic suture material for tendon transfer surgeries in the upper extremity - a biomechanical comparative analysis.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jun;144(6):2905-2914. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05322-5. Epub 2024 May 2. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 38693291 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hurwit D, Fanton G, Tella M et al (2014) Viscoelastic properties of common suture material used for rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic procedures. Arthroscopy 30:1406–1412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.030 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jordan MC, Boelch S, Jansen H et al (2016) Does plastic suture deformation induce gapping after tendon repair? A biomechanical comparison of different suture materials. J Biomech 49:2607–2612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.05.023 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Algeri JA, Me B DYNACORDTM Suture: comparative monitoring of the compression force using pressure film. 2. https://www.jnjmedtech.com/system/files/pdf/115003-210422%20-%20DYNACORD...
-
- Bhattacharyya S, Mafilios M, Spenciner D, Algeri J DYNACORDTM Suture: comparative evaluation of knot security in a mechanical model. 2. http://synthes.vo.llnwd.net/o16/LLNWMB8/INT%20Mobile/Synthes%20Internati...
-
- Neuhofer S, Wieser K, Lajtai G et al (2014) Surgical knot tightening: how much pull is necessary? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2849–2855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2452-9 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources