Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 28;4(1):152.
doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00526-z.

Study protocol: Novel Methods for Implementing Measurement-Based Care with youth in Low-Resource Environments (NIMBLE)

Affiliations

Study protocol: Novel Methods for Implementing Measurement-Based Care with youth in Low-Resource Environments (NIMBLE)

Ruben G Martinez et al. Implement Sci Commun. .

Abstract

Background: For youth receiving care in community mental health centers, comorbidities are the rule rather than the exception. Using measurement-based care (MBC), or the routine evaluation of symptoms to inform care decisions, as the foundation of treatment for youth with comorbid problems significantly improves the impact of psychotherapy by focusing care and building engagement and alliance. MBC increases the rate of symptom improvement, detects clients who would otherwise deteriorate, and alerts clinicians to non-responders. Despite its demonstrated utility, MBC is rarely implemented with fidelity; less than 15% of providers report using MBC per recommendations. Previous efforts to support MBC implementation have yielded suboptimal outcomes, in part, due to organizations' challenges with identifying and prioritizing barriers and selecting and developing strategies to overcome them. New methods are needed for identifying and prioritizing barriers, and matching strategies to barriers to optimize MBC implementation and treatment quality to improve youth mental health outcomes in community settings.

Methods: Pragmatic implementation methods will be piloted in four diverse community mental health centers. Methods include (a) rapid evidence synthesis; (b) rapid ethnography; (c) design kits (e.g., kits with disposable cameras, journals, maps); (d) barrier prioritization, and (e) causal pathway diagramming. These activities will generate actionable barriers; subsequently, we will use facilitated group processes to prioritize barriers and develop causal pathway diagrams to match strategies to barriers to create implementation plans that optimize MBC fidelity (Aim 1). We will track strategy deployment for 6 months, then compare MBC fidelity for another 6 months post-implementation with data from 2 years of historical controls (Aim 2). Finally, we will co-design a toolkit for design kit methods with youth and the practice and scientific communities (Aim 3).

Discussion: Optimizing MBC implementation in community mental health centers could transform youth mental health care by ensuring the most pressing symptoms are targeted early in treatment. The discussion section highlights expected challenges and limits to using the five methods, including recruitment and engagement given the high pressure on community mental health settings.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT05644756 . Registered on 18 November 2022. This trial was retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Community mental health; Measurement-based care; Rapid ethnographic assessment; Tailoring implementation; Youth mental health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A diagram of study activities. REA, rapid ethnographic assessment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Barrier identification methods
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Design kit materials. Materials include seven activity cards and an instruction card, a study information sheet, a journal, two pens, a disposable camera, a stress ball, and two pieces of chocolate
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Implementation planning methods
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
An empty causal pathway diagram
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
An example completed causal pathway diagram. PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; MBC, measurement-based care
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
IMPACT quality model (IQM)

References

    1. Bickman L, et al. Effects of routine feedback to clinicians on mental health outcomes of youths: results of a randomized trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(12):1423–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.002052011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Foa EB, Stein DJ, McFarlane AC. Symptomatology and psychopathology of mental health problems after disaster. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:15–25. - PubMed
    1. Scott K, Lewis CC. Using measurement-based care to enhance any treatment. Cogn Behav Pract. 2015;22(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.01.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McLeod BD, et al. To utility and beyond! Specifying and advancing the utility of measurement-based care for youth. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2022;51(4):375–388. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2042698. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewis CC, et al. Implementing measurement-based care in behavioral health: a review. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(3):324–335. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data