Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 11;5(1):vdad116.
doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad116. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

NRG/RTOG 0837: Randomized, phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of chemoradiation with or without cediranib in newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Affiliations

NRG/RTOG 0837: Randomized, phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of chemoradiation with or without cediranib in newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Tracy T Batchelor et al. Neurooncol Adv. .

Abstract

Background: A randomized, phase II, placebo-controlled, and blinded clinical trial (NCT01062425) was conducted to determine the efficacy of cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, versus placebo in combination with radiation and temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive (1) cediranib (20 mg) in combination with radiation and temozolomide; (2) placebo in combination with radiation and temozolomide. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) based on blinded, independent radiographic assessment of postcontrast T1-weighted and noncontrast T2-weighted MRI brain scans and was tested using a 1-sided Z test for 2 proportions. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated per CTCAE version 4.

Results: One hundred and fifty-eight patients were randomized, out of which 9 were ineligible and 12 were not evaluable for the primary endpoint, leaving 137 eligible and evaluable. 6-month PFS was 46.6% in the cediranib arm versus 24.5% in the placebo arm (P = .005). There was no significant difference in overall survival between the 2 arms. There was more grade ≥ 3 AEs in the cediranib arm than in the placebo arm (P = .02).

Conclusions: This study met its primary endpoint of prolongation of 6-month PFS with cediranib in combination with radiation and temozolomide versus placebo in combination with radiation and temozolomide. There was no difference in overall survival between the 2 arms.

Keywords: angiogenesis; cediranib; glioblastoma; vascular endothelial growth factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Chakravarti, Ashby, Robins, Gray, Voloschin, Chamarthy, Kwok, Cescon, Sharma, Chaudhary, Polley and Ms Won have nothing to disclose. Dr Batchelor reports grants from AstraZeneca and Pfizer for support of clinical trials; personal fees from Merck for lectures, NXDC, Amgen, Roche, Oxigene, Proximagen/Usher, Genomicare, and Champions Biotechnology for scientific advisory board outside the submitted work; other potentially influencing activities, which are CME lectures Oakstone Medical Publishing, Oncology Audio Digest, Research To Practice, and Imedex, Editorial Board of UpToDate, Inc, and consulting in Jiahui Health, Consulting. Dr Hadjipanayis reports royalties from NX Development Corporation, and consulting in Synaptive Medical. Dr Shi reports grants from Regeneron for research funding; grants and personal fees from Novocure for research funding and consulting; personal fees from Brainlab, and Varian for consulting. Dr Stieber reports personal fees from Novocure for the speaker’s bureau. Dr Fiveash reports grants and others from Varian for consulting research and educational contracts. Dr Robinson reports grants and personal fees from Varian for MRA, grants for personal projects and consulting; grants from Elekta for personal projects; and equity from Radialogica. Dr Mehta reports personal fees from Karyopharm, Tocagen, AstraZeneca, Blue Earth, Celgene, and Abbvie for consulting, and Oncoceutics for the board of directors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overall survival by treatment arm.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Progression-free survival by treatment arm.

References

    1. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central Nervous System Tumours. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021. (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th ed.; vol. 6)
    1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. ; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987–996. - PubMed
    1. Jain RK, di Tomaso E, Duda DG, et al. . Angiogenesis in brain tumours. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(8):610–622. - PubMed
    1. Holash J, Maisonpierre PC, Compton D, et al. . Vessel cooption, regression, and growth in tumors mediated by angiopoietins and VEGF. Science. 1999;284(5422):1994–1998. - PubMed
    1. Shweiki D, Itin A, Soffer D, Keshet E.. Vascular endothelial growth factor induced by hypoxia may mediate hypoxia-initiated angiogenesis. Nature. 1992;359(6398):843–845. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources