Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 3:14:1271165.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1271165. eCollection 2023.

The Utah psychotropic oversight program: collaboratively addressing antipsychotic use within youth in foster care without prior authorization

Affiliations

The Utah psychotropic oversight program: collaboratively addressing antipsychotic use within youth in foster care without prior authorization

Eric T Monson et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Objectives: Fostered youth have increased risk of exposure to trauma. Antipsychotic medications are often utilized within the foster care system, potentially to address problematic behaviors that may be associated with trauma. The Utah Psychotropic Oversight Program (UPOP) was formed to support prescribers and encourage evidence-based treatment approaches for fostered youth. However, it is unclear what impact an oversight program can have on a high turnover population and without tools such as prior authorization. This study evaluates 4 years of collected data from the UPOP program for efficacy and to identify future intervention targets.

Methods: Deidentified data were collected as a routine function of the oversight program over 4 years (01/2019-12/2022), from individuals aged 0-18 years old (total N = 8,523, 48.3% female). UPOP oversight criteria: ≤6yo + any psychotropic medication, ≥7yo + 2 or more psychotropic medications. For this analysis, youth were divided by UPOP individuals ever receiving an antipsychotic (AP) prescription (UPOP_AP; N = 755, 42.3% female) or not (UPOP_NAP, N = 1,006, 48.3% female) and non-UPOP fostered (N = 6,762, 48.9% female). Comparisons were made across demographic and clinical variables via ANOVA, Chi-square, unpaired t-test, and logistic regression.

Results: UPOP_AP more likely to be older males with behavioral diagnoses, increased polypharmacy, longer duration of fostering, and higher care level. AP prescription rates dropped from 52.8 to 39.1% for males and 43.3 to 38.2% in females with unchanged number of psychotropic prescriptions and care level across 2019-2022. UPOP_AP that discontinued AP treatment had fewer average psychotropic medications, but increased antidepressant and sleep prescriptions, as compared with individuals that remained on AP.

Conclusion: Youth within the foster care system receive antipsychotics at high rates and in an uneven distribution. Prescribing practices can change in the context of supportive oversight programs without components such as prior authorization, and without increasing the need for higher levels of care. Specific emphasis on the treatment of mood, anxiety, and sleep issues may also lead to greater success in discontinuing AP treatment. Oversight may support treatment providers while reducing exposure to medications with considerable side effect burden that could cause future comorbidity.

Keywords: adolescent; antipsychotic; foster; polypharmacy; trauma; youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends in medication prescription rates and required level of care for UPOP youth. Line plots demonstrating various trends in medication and level of care requirements in UPOP youth. (A) Represents the percentage rate of antipsychotic prescription across male, female, and all UPOP youth from 2019 and 2022. (B) Represents the average count of the maximum concurrent psychotropic prescriptions per individual youth within the UPOP_AP and UPOP_NAP groups. (C) Demonstrates percentage rate of UPOP youth requiring foster care level 4 or above services.

Similar articles

References

    1. (NDACAN) NDAoCAaN . Report No.: 274. Adoption and Foster Care analysis and reporting system (Afcars), Foster Care File 2021 [Data Set]. National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect (NDACAN): Children’s Bureau DoHaHS. (2023). doi: 10.34681/MW23-Q135 - DOI
    1. Dorsey S, Burns BJ, Southerland DG, Cox JR, Wagner HR, Farmer EM. Prior trauma exposure for youth in treatment Foster Care. J Child Fam Stud. (2012) 21:816–24. doi: 10.1007/s10826-011-9542-4, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charak R, Ford JD, Modrowski CA, Kerig PK. Polyvictimization, emotion dysregulation, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, and behavioral health problems among justice-involved youth: a latent class analysis. J Abnorm Child Psychol. (2019) 47:287–98. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0431-9, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suliman S, Mkabile SG, Fincham DS, Ahmed R, Stein DJ, Seedat S. Cumulative effect of multiple trauma on symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression in adolescents. Compr Psychiatry. (2009) 50:121–7. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.06.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vanderwerker L, Akincigil A, Olfson M, Gerhard T, Neese-Todd S, Crystal S. Foster Care, externalizing disorders, and antipsychotic use among Medicaid-enrolled youths. Psychiatr Serv. (2014) 65:1281–4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300455, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed