In vitro and in vivo embryo production efficiency in Flemish and Holstein donor females
- PMID: 38025999
- PMCID: PMC10681134
- DOI: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0080
In vitro and in vivo embryo production efficiency in Flemish and Holstein donor females
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare embryo production efficiency in Flemish and Holstein donor females using ovum pick-up and in vitro fertilization (OPU-IVF) or in vivo production (superovulation; SOV) procedures. The study was conducted using a split-plot design, with eight Flemish and eight Holstein non-lactating cycling females. Females were subjected to ten weekly OPU/IVF sessions and/or two SOV/embryo collections sessions at a 63-day interval, for a total of 160 OPU-IVF and 32 SOV sessions. Mean numbers of follicles and corpora lutea, and cumulus-oocyte complex (COC) recovery rates were similar between breeds after the OPU and SOV sessions. However, Flemish donors yielded better quality grade II COCs (301, 41.9%) than Holstein females (609, and 202, 33.1%). Also, cleavage and blastocyst rates, and the total number and the mean number of viable embryos obtained after OPU-IVF were higher in Flemish (49.6% and 11.8%, and 63 and 11.8 per donor, respectively) than in Holstein (32.8% and 7.2%, and 34 and 7.2 per donor, respectively) females. Flemish females were also more efficient in yielding viable embryos after SOV (111, 7.3 per donor) than Holstein (48, 3.3 per donor) females. Overall, Flemish donor females had better responses to OPU-IVF or SOV procedures than Holstein counterparts. Irrespective of the breeds, SOV procedures were more efficient than OPU-IVF in yielding more viable embryos, under the conditions of this study. Both reproductive procedures were useful tools for the genetic conservation of the Flemish cattle breed in Southern Brazil.
Keywords: breed conservation; cattle; in vitro fertilization; multiple ovulation; ovum pick-up.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Figures


References
-
- Alfonzo EPM, McManus CM, Campos GS, Portes JV, Padilha AH, Peripolli V, Braccini J., No Spatial distribution of Brazilian bovine taurine breeds associated with climatic, physical and socioeconomic variables. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2021;73(3):693–702. doi: 10.1590/1678-4162-12206. - DOI
-
- Aller JF, Mucci NC, Kaiser GG, Ríos G, Callejas SS, Alberio RH. Transvaginal follicular aspiration and embryo development in superstimulated early postpartum beef cows and subsequent fertility after artificial insemination. Anim Reprod Sci. 2010;119(1-2):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.11.009. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aziz RLA, Khalil A, Abdel-Wahab A, Hassan NY, Abdel-Hamied E, Kasimanickam RK. Relationship among circulating anti-Müllerian hormone, insulin like growth factor 1, cadmium and superovulatory response in dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2017;100:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baldrighi JM, Sá MF, Fo, Batista EOS, Lopes RNVR, Visintin JA, Baruselli PS, Assumpção MEOA. Anti-mullerian hormone concentration and antral ovarian follicle population in Murrah heifers compared to Holstein and Gyr kept under the same management. Reprod Domest Anim. 2014;49(6):1015–1020. doi: 10.1111/rda.12430. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Batista EO, Guerreiro BM, Freitas BG, Silva JC, Vieira LM, Ferreira RM, Rezende RG, Basso AC, Lopes RN, Rennó FP, Souza AH, Baruselli PS. Plasma anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictive endocrine marker to select Bos taurus (Holstein) and Bos indicus (Nelore) calves for in vitro embryo production. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2016;54:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2015.08.001. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources