Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 18;16(11):1845-1853.
doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.11.17. eCollection 2023.

Effectiveness of toric soft contact lenses for vision correction in patients with different degrees of astigmatism: a real-world study

Affiliations

Effectiveness of toric soft contact lenses for vision correction in patients with different degrees of astigmatism: a real-world study

Guo-Yun Zhang et al. Int J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Aim: To assess the visual correction of patients with different degrees of astigmatism with toric soft contact lenses (TSC).

Methods: It was a real-world study with prospective and single-arm design. A total of 384 patients with astigmatism who came for TSC fitting and alignment from November 2022 to January 2023 were included. According to the difference in astigmatism, patients were divided into groups A (cylinder degree: -0.75 to -0.50 D), B (cylinder degree: -1.75 to -1.00 D) and C (cylinder degree ≤ -2.00 D), and followed up on the day of wear, 1wk, 1 and 3mo, mainly to observe visual acuity, refraction, lens fit, visual quality and comfort at 1wk after wear. The visual acuity success rate and the overall success rate of the fitting were evaluation indicators (taking into account the four dimensions of visual acuity, fitting, quality of vision and comfort). The visual acuity success rate was calculated by taking "corrected visual acuity with contact lenses is no less than 1 line or better than best spectacle-corrected visual acuity" (i.e. corrected visual acuity with contact lenses is 1 line below, equal to, one line above or more than best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) as the criterion for visual success, and the the overall success rate of the fitting was calculated by using the comprehensive indicators (visual acuity, fit, visual quality, comfort) to meet certain conditions as the judgment criteria for successful fitting.

Results: After 1wk of wearing TSC, the visual acuity success rates of patients were 100% (207/207), 98.58% (139/141) and 97.22% (35/36) in the three groups, respectively, with residual cylinder closed to 0. The acceptability of the lens fitting was over 95%; the incidence of adverse visual symptoms was within 10% and the comfort acceptability was over 97%. The overall success rate of fitting for patients with high, medium and low astigmatism was 93.72% (194/207), 90.78% (128/141) and 88.89% (32/36), respectively.

Conclusion: TSC (model: G&G POP·CT) are effective in correcting astigmatism in patients with different degrees of astigmatism.

Keywords: astigmatism; toric soft contact lenses; visual acuity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The proportion of visual acuity achieving 0.1 or better in each group at various follow-up visits
aP<0.05, representing a statistically significant difference among the three groups; X-axis: The proportion of visual acuity achieving 0.1 or better; Y-axis: Various follow-up visits; CVA: Corrected visual acuity with contact lenses; Group A: Cylinder degree range of -0.75 to -0.50 D; Group B: Cylinder degree range of -1.75 to -1.00 D; Group C: Cylinder degree ≤-2.00 D.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The proportion of visual acuity achieving 0.0 or better in each group at various follow-up visits
aP<0.05, representing a statistically significant difference among the three groups; X-axis: The proportion of visual acuity achieving 0.0 or better; Y-axis: Various follow-up visits; CVA: Corrected visual acuity with contact lenses; Group A: Cylinder degree range of -0.75 to -0.50 D; Group B: Cylinder degree range of -1.75 to -1.00 D; Group C: Cylinder degree ≤-2.00 D.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The proportion of residual cylinder degree within ±0.5 D for each group at various follow-up visits
X-axis: The proportion of residual cylinder degree within ±0.5 D; Y-axis: Various follow-up visits; Group A: Cylinder degree range of -0.75 to -0.50 D; Group B: Cylinder degree range of -1.75 to -1.00 D; Group C: Cylinder degree ≤-2.00 D.
Figure 4
Figure 4. The efficiency of cylinder degree correction in different groups at various follow-up visits
X-axis: The efficiency of cylinder degree correction; Y-axis: Various follow-up visits; Group A: Cylinder degree range of -0.75 to -0.50 D; Group B: Cylinder degree range of -1.75 to -1.00 D; Group C: Cylinder degree ≤-2.00 D.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fricke TR, Jong M, Naidoo KS, et al. Global prevalence of visual impairment associated with myopic macular degeneration and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050:systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(7):855–862. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morgan PB, Sulley AL. Challenges to the new soft contact lens wearer and strategies for clinical management. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023;46(3):101827. - PubMed
    1. Waghmare SV, Jeria S. A review of contact lens-related risk factors and complications. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e30118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rhee MK, Jacobs DS, Dhaliwal DK, Szczotka-Flynn L, Prescott CR, Jhanji V, Steinemann TL, Koffler BH, Jeng BH. Contact lens safety for the correction of refractive error in healthy eyes. Eye Contact Lens. 2022;48(11):449–454. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holden BA. The principles and practice of correcting astigmatism with soft contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 1975;58(8):279–299.

LinkOut - more resources