Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 27:13:11.
doi: 10.12688/mep.19566.1. eCollection 2023.

A hitchhikers' guide to the terminology of accreditation processes for health professionals and institutions

Affiliations

A hitchhikers' guide to the terminology of accreditation processes for health professionals and institutions

Nuno Sousa et al. MedEdPublish (2016). .

Abstract

Accreditation processes for health care professions are designed to ensure that individuals and programs in these fields meet established standards of quality and effectiveness. The accelerating pace of globalization in the health care professions has increased the need for a shared understanding of the vocabulary of evaluation, assessment, and accreditation. The psychometric principles of valid and reliable assessment are commonly accepted, but the terminology is confusing. We believe that all stakeholders - evaluators, faculty, students but also the community - will benefit from a shared language and common set of definitions. We recognize that not all readers will agree with the definitions we propose, but we hope that this guide will help to ensure clarity, consistency, transparency, and fairness, and that it will promote through the stimulation of a debate greater collaboration across national and international boundaries.

Keywords: accreditation; assessment; certification; evaluation; licensing; outcomes; outputs; quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Amaral E, Norcini J: Quality assurance in health professions education: Role of accreditation and licensure. Med Educ. 2023;57(1):40–48. 10.1111/medu.14880 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bandiera G, Frank J, Scheele F, et al. : Effective accreditation in postgraduate medical education: from process to outcomes and back. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(Suppl 1):307. 10.1186/s12909-020-02123-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bendermacher GWG, Dolmans DHJM, de Grave WS, et al. : Advancing quality culture in health professions education: experiences and perspectives of educational leaders. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021;26(2):467–487. 10.1007/s10459-020-09996-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook DA, Bridges R, Ginsburg S, et al. : A contemporary approach to validity arguments: A practical guide to Kane’s framework. Med Educ. 2015;49(6):560–75. 10.1111/medu.12678 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Epstein RM: Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):387–96. 10.1056/NEJMra054784 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources