Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with delayed second doses of antibiotics in sepsis at a large academic medical center
- PMID: 38028903
- PMCID: PMC10654957
- DOI: 10.1017/ash.2023.480
Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with delayed second doses of antibiotics in sepsis at a large academic medical center
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical impact of delays in second doses of antibiotics in patients with sepsis.
Design: Single-center, retrospective, observational study.
Setting: Large teaching hospital.
Patients: Adult patients who triggered an electronic sepsis alert in the emergency department (ED), received ≥2 doses of vancomycin or an antipseudomonal beta-lactam, and were discharged with an ICD-10 sepsis code.
Methods: We assessed the prevalence of delays in second doses of antibiotics by ≥25% of the recommended dose interval and conducted multivariate regression analyses to assess for risk factors for delays and in-hospital mortality.
Results: The cohort included 449 patients, of whom 123 (27.4%) had delays in second doses. In-hospital death occurred in 31 patients (25.2%) in the delayed group and 71 (21.8%) in the non-delayed group (p = 0.44). On multivariate analysis, only location in a non-ED unit at the time second doses were due was associated with delays (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.20-6.32). In the mortality model, significant risk factors included malignant tumor, respiratory infection, and elevated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score but not delayed second antibiotic doses (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.69-2.05). In a subgroup analysis, delayed second doses were associated with higher mortality in patients admitted to non-intensive care units (ICUs) (OR 4.10, 95% CI 1.32-12.79).
Conclusions: Over a quarter of patients with sepsis experienced delays in second doses of antibiotics. Delays in second antibiotic doses were not associated with higher mortality overall, but an association was observed among patients admitted to non-ICUs.
© The Author(s) 2023.
Conflict of interest statement
M.C., B.S., M.S., K.M., K.L., and J.D. report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Delayed Second Dose Antibiotics for Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department With Sepsis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):956-965. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002377. Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28328652
-
The effect of delays in second-dose antibiotics on patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;47:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.057. Epub 2021 Mar 22. Am J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 33784532 Free PMC article.
-
The DISPARITY-II study: delays to antibiotic administration in women with severe sepsis or septic shock.Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;21(12):1499-502. doi: 10.1111/acem.12546. Epub 2014 Nov 25. Acad Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 25424151
-
A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department.BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):787-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003552. Epub 2015 Aug 6. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015. PMID: 26251506 Review.
-
Sepsis Resulting from Delays in Treatment and Miscommunication among Specialists.2023 Mar 15. In: WebM&M: Case Studies [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2019 Oct 30–. 2023 Mar 15. In: WebM&M: Case Studies [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2019 Oct 30–. PMID: 40106612 Free Books & Documents. Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- Rhee C, Yu T, Wang R et al. Association between implementation of the severe sepsis and septic shock early management bundle performance measure and outcomes in patients with suspected sepsis in US hospitals. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2138596. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38596 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources