Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 7;30(12):1640-1657.e8.
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Nov 28.

VEGFA mRNA-LNP promotes biliary epithelial cell-to-hepatocyte conversion in acute and chronic liver diseases and reverses steatosis and fibrosis

Affiliations

VEGFA mRNA-LNP promotes biliary epithelial cell-to-hepatocyte conversion in acute and chronic liver diseases and reverses steatosis and fibrosis

Fatima Rizvi et al. Cell Stem Cell. .

Abstract

The liver is known for its remarkable regenerative ability through proliferation of hepatocytes. Yet, during chronic injury or severe hepatocyte death, proliferation of hepatocytes is exhausted. To overcome this hurdle, we propose vascular-endothelial-growth-factor A (VEGFA) as a therapeutic means to accelerate biliary epithelial-cell (BEC)-to-hepatocyte conversion. Investigation in zebrafish establishes that blocking VEGF receptors abrogates BEC-driven liver repair, while VEGFA overexpression promotes it. Delivery of VEGFA via nonintegrative and safe nucleoside-modified mRNA encapsulated into lipid nanoparticles (mRNA-LNPs) in acutely or chronically injured mouse livers induces robust BEC-to-hepatocyte conversion and elimination of steatosis and fibrosis. In human and murine diseased livers, we further identified VEGFA-receptor KDR-expressing BECs associated with KDR-expressing cell-derived hepatocytes. This work defines KDR-expressing cells, most likely being BECs, as facultative progenitors. This study reveals unexpected therapeutic benefits of VEGFA delivered via nucleoside-modified mRNA-LNP, whose safety is widely validated with COVID-19 vaccines, for harnessing BEC-driven repair to potentially treat liver diseases.

Keywords: BEC-derived intermediate liver progenitor cells; BEC-driven liver regeneration; KDR; VEGFA mRNA-LNP; acute liver injury; cholangiocyte-driven liver regeneration; chronic liver injury; ductular reaction; human liver cirrhosis; mouse liver injury model; zebrafish liver injury model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests In accordance with the University of Pennsylvania’s policies and procedures and our ethical obligations as researchers, we report that D.W. is named on patents that describe the use of nucleoside-modified mRNA as a platform to deliver therapeutic proteins. D.W. and N.P. are also named on a patent describing the use of modified mRNA in lipid nanoparticles. D.W., N.P., and V.G.-E. are named on a patent describing the use of nucleoside-modified mRNA in lipid nanoparticles to treat liver diseases. D.W., R.D.-A., R.M.F., A.O., and A.S.-G. have a provisional international patent application that describes the use of nucleoside-modified mRNA in lipid nanoparticles to treat liver diseases. D.W., A.O., and A.S.-G. are co-founders and have a financial interest in Pittsburgh ReLiver, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. VEGFR signaling regulates BEC-driven liver regeneration in zebrafish.
(A) Single-optical section images showing the expression of Bhmt (gray), Tp1:H2B-mCherry (red), and fabp10a:CFP-NTR (green) in regenerating livers (dotted lines) at R24h. Scheme illustrates the periods of Mtz and SU5416 treatments and analysis stage. Quantification of the percentage of hepatocytes (Bhmt+) among BEC-derived cells (H2B-mCherry+) and of liver size. (B) Whole-mount in situ hybridization images showing gc and f5 expression (arrows) in regenerating livers at R24h. Numbers in the upper-right corner indicate the proportion of larvae exhibiting the phenotype shown. Based on the levels of hepatic gc and f5 expression, larvae were divided into three groups: no, weak, and strong. (C) Single-optical section images showing the expression of Tp1:H2B-mCherry, fabp10a:CFP-NTR, and Bhmt in regenerating livers (dashed lines) at R26h. To overexpress sFlt1, Tg(hs:sflt1) larvae were heat-shocked four times at A13h, A24h, A35h, and R10h. Quantification of the percentage of Bhmt+ among BEC-derived cells and of liver size. (D) Maximum projection images showing the expression of hs:loxP-mCherry-loxP and Bhmt in regenerating livers (dashed lines) at R3h. The Tg(Tp1:CreERT2) and Tg(hs:loxP-mCherry-loxP-hVEGFA) lines were used to express hVEGFA in a subset of BEC-derived cells during regeneration. Larvae were treated with 10 μM 4-OHT from 2.5 to 3.5 dpf for 24 hours, heat-shocked twice at A20h and A34h, and harvested at R3h. Quantification of the percentage of Bhmt+ area in the liver. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired two-tailed t-test, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, and ****p<0.0001. Scale bars: Scale bars: 50μm (A,C,D), 100μm (B). See also Figure S1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. VEGFA mRNA-LNP induces BEC-to-hepatocyte conversion and promotes liver repair in chronic CDE/p21 and acute APAP/p21 liver injury models in Krt19-CreERT,R26LSLtdTomato mice.
(A) Schematic depicting CDE/p21 injury model in female mice. (B) Human-specific VEGFA ELISA from sera of uninjured control (n=3), or mice injured with APAP (n=4) or CDE (n=4). (C) Stitched images of tdTomato+ clusters (outlined yellow) in livers from CDE/p21 injured mice. Quantification of tdTomato+ areas in both groups. (D) tdTomato+ (red) and KRT7+ (green) cells in the CDE/p21 model. Close-up images of tdTomato+ hepatocytes (arrowheads) adjacent to tdTomato+KRT7+ BECs (arrows) in VEGFA mRNA-LNP-treated mice. * Represents tdTomato+ BECs. (E) tdTomato and PAS staining on serial sections of liver tissue showing glycogen storage in tdTomato+ hepatocytes in CDE/p21 model. (F) Representative histograms from flow cytometry of hepatocyte fractions from female Krt19-CreERT,R26LSLtdTomato mice treated as shown in Figure 2A. Red histograms represent % tdTomato+ populations within the hepatocyte fractions. Blue histograms represent hepatocytes from a control non-tdTomato background. Calculation of % tdTomato+ hepatocytes by extrapolating the lineage tracing efficiency as 100% across all mice in CDE/p21 model. (G) Brightfield images and quantification of % trichrome-positive areas from three different fields in each mouse (n=4 mice per treatment) in CDE/p21 model. (H) Images of LipidSpot staining showing lipids (green) in hepatocytes and quantification of % LipidSpot-stained areas from three different fields in each mouse (n=4 mice per treatment) in CDE/p21 model. (I) Schematic depicting APAP/p21 injury model in female mice. (J) Immunofluorescence images and quantification of KRT7+ BECs in APAP or APAP/p21 models 12 days after APAP. (K) Stitched immunofluorescence images of tdTomato+ areas (outlined in yellow) in APAP/p21 model and quantification of tdTomato+ areas. (L) Representative histograms from flow cytometry of hepatocyte fractions isolated 21 days after APAP from male Krt19-CreERT,R26LSLtdTomato mice treated as shown in Figure 2I with 300mg/kg APAP. Red histograms represent % tdTomato+ populations within the hepatocyte fractions, and blue histograms, the hepatocytes from a control non-tdTomato background. Calculation of % tdTomato+ hepatocytes by extrapolating the lineage tracing efficiency as 100% across all mice. (M) Immunofluorescence images of tdTomato+ hepatocyte (arrows) in APAP/p21 model costained with HNF4A (green) 21 days after injury. Close-up images of HNF4A+ cells within a tdTomato+ biliary duct. (N) tdTomato and PAS staining on serial sections of liver demonstrating glycogen storage in tdTomato+ hepatocytes in APAP/p21 model 21 days after injury. Numerical data are presented as mean ± s.d. Two-tailed Student’s t-test, *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p<0.0001. See also Figure S2 and S3.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. VEGFA mRNA-LNP induces BEC-to-hepatocyte conversion and promotes liver repair in chronic CDE/p21 and acute APAP/p21 liver injury models in Kdr-2A-CreERT2-2Ae-YFP mice.
(A, B) Expression of KDR (red) in BECs (green) depicted by arrowheads 3 days after injury in female mice in CDE/p21 (A) and APAP/p21 (B) models. (C) Schematic depicting the CDE/p21 model. (D) Close-up images of a bile duct showing tdTomato+ EpCAM+ BECs in CDE/p21 injury model. (E) Stitched immunofluorescence images of tdTomato+ areas (outlined yellow) in CDE/p21 injury model. Quantification of the tdTomato+ areas in both groups. (F) Representative brightfield images of Oil Red O-stained liver showing lipids in CDE/p21 injury model. Quantification of the % Oil Red O-stained areas averaged from three different fields in each mouse (n=3 mice per group). (G) Immunofluorescence images of tdTomato+ hepatocytes costained with HNF4A or CD26 (outlined and identified with *) in CDE/p21 injury model. (H) Schematic of the APAP/p21 injury model with 300 mg/kg for males (n=6) or 500 mg/kg for females (n=6). (I) Stitched immunofluorescence images of tdTomato+ areas (outlined yellow) and quantification of tdTomato+ areas in APAP/p21 injury model. (J) Immunofluorescence images of tdTomato+ hepatocytes (outlined and identified with *) in APAP/p21 injury model costained with HNF4A (green) or CD26 (green). (K) Immunofluorescence images of YFP+ liver cells in Kdr-2A-CreERT2-2A-eYFP mice 3 days after APAP (400 mg/kg for male or 500 mg/kg for female). Close-ups show BECs co-expressing YFP (green) and EpCAM (red) (arrowheads) and large intermediate hepatocyte-like cells expressing YFP (green) (arrows). Numerical data are presented as mean ± s.d. Two-tailed Student’s t-test, *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S4.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. KDR+ BEC fraction after liver injury is molecularly distinct from the KDR- BEC fraction and exhibits VEGF signaling response as well as an epithelial-mesenchymal transition signature.
(A) Experimental design for scRNA seq experiment. In total 2 hepatocyte and 2 NPC fractions were analyzed from 2 mice. (B) UMAP of the scRNA seq data at the Louvain resolution 0.25. UMAP on the right is obtained after re-clustering of cluster 4 (Hep), cluster 13 (BEC2) and cluster 14 (BEC1) from the UMAP on the left. (C) Heatmap of few key genes related to hepatocytes, progenitor/BEC, EMT and VEGF response in BEC1 and BEC2 clusters. (D) Violin plots for selected genes in BEC1 and BEC2 populations. (E) Violin plots for GO biological process GSEA analysis using differential genes expressed between BEC2 and BEC1 populations. P value calculated with paired t-test. See also Figure S5.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. VEGFA mRNA-LNP increases the numbers of BEC-derived progenitor cells in chronically injured mouse livers.
(A) Schematic of the CDE/p21 injury model for (B). (B) Immunofluorescence images of proliferative EdU+ cells and KRT7+ BECs. Quantitation of KRT7+EdU+ BECs using 3 image fields per mice. (C) Schematic of the CDE/p21 injury model for (C-H). (D) Immunofluorescence images of GFP/YFP+ cells and EpCAM+ BECs. Quantitation of GFP/YFP+EpCAM- clusters in both groups (n=3 mice per group). All liver lobes in control Luc group were analyzed, while only 2 lobes per mice were in VEGFA group. (E) Distribution of GFP/YFP+EpCAM- clusters based on numbers of cells per cluster. (F) Averaged numbers of GFP/YFP+EpCAM- cells per cluster. (G) Immunofluorescence images of proliferative GFP/YFP+EdU+ cells in VEGFA mRNA-LNP-treated mice in CDE/p21 injury model. (H) Immunofluorescence images of GFP/YFP+ cells and KRT7+ BECs. Yellow arrowheads denote GFP/YFP+KRT7+ cells and white arrows GFP/YFP+KRT7- cells. (I) Immunofluorescence images of GFP/YFP+ cells and KDR+ cells. Yellow arrowheads denote GFP/YFP+KDR+ cells and white arrows GFP/YFP+KDR- cells. (J) Immunofluorescence images of GFP/YFP+ cells and HNF4A+ cells. Arrow denotes GFP/YFP+ cells with weak HNF4A staining. Numerical data are presented as mean ± s.d. Two-tailed Student’s t-test, *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p<0.0001. See also Figure S5.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Evidence of BEC-to-hepatocyte conversion in human liver samples from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis and alcoholic cirrhosis ESLD patients.
(A) Immunofluorescence images of p21 expression in 4 out of 5 human cirrhotic liver specimens. (B) Immunofluorescence images of small cuboidal KRT7+ BECs (arrowheads) and KRT7+ intermediate hepatocyte-like cells (arrows) present in the regenerative nodules (*) close to the fibrous septa (outlined). (C) Immunofluorescence images of KRT7+ and GS+ cells in human cirrhotic specimens. White arrowheads depict GS+KRT7+ BECs. White arrows depict the rare GS+KRT7+ intermediate hepatocyte-like cells and yellow arrows the GS+KRT7- intermediate hepatocyte-like cells. See also Figure S6 and S7.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. Evidence of KDR expression on BECs in human liver samples from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis and alcoholic cirrhosis ESLD patients.
(A) Immunofluorescence images of cirrhotic liver specimens HH121 and HH125 showing fibrous septa stained for KRT7+ BECs and KDR+ sinusoidal endothelial cells. Note numerous KRT7+KDR+ BECs (arrowheads) and larger KDR+ intermediate hepatocyte-like cells (arrows) surrounding the KRT7+KDR+ BECs. (B) Relative gene expression of KDR, KRT7, HNF4A in hepatocytes (Heps) isolated from normal (n=5) or cirrhotic human livers Child-Pugh B (n=5) and Child-Pugh C (n=4). (C) Western blots showing protein expression of KDR, KRT7, HNF4A in hepatocytes isolated from normal or cirrhotic human livers Child-Pugh B (n=3) and Child-Pugh C (n=3) analyzed in panel D. GAPDH serves as endogenous control. Numerical data are presented as mean ± s.d. Two-tailed Student’s t-test for comparison between two groups, *p < 0.05. See also Figure S7.

Update of

References

    1. Michalopoulos GK (2017). Hepatostat: Liver regeneration and normal liver tissue maintenance. Hepatology 65, 1384–1392. 10.1002/hep.28988. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duncan AW, Dorrell C, and Grompe M (2009). Stem cells and liver regeneration. Gastroenterology 137,466–481.S0016–5085(09)00818-X[pii]10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.044. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanger BZ (2015). Cellular homeostasis and repair in the Mammalian liver. Annu Rev Physiol 77, 179–200. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170255. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodrigo-Torres D, Affo S, Coll M, Morales-Ibanez O, Millan C, Blaya D, Alvarez-Guaita A, Rentero C, Lozano JJ, Maestro MA, et al. (2014). The biliary epithelium gives rise to liver progenitor cells. Hepatology 60, 1367–1377. 10.1002/hep.27078. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shin S, and Kaestner KH (2014). The origin, biology, and therapeutic potential of facultative adult hepatic progenitor cells. Curr Top Dev Biol 107, 269–292. 10.1016/B978-0-12-416022-4.00010-XB978-0-12-416022-4.00010-X [pii]. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types