Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 5;82(23):2212-2221.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.826.

Adjusting for Congenital Heart Surgery Risk Using Administrative Data

Affiliations

Adjusting for Congenital Heart Surgery Risk Using Administrative Data

Natalie Jayaram et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: Congenital heart surgery (CHS) encompasses a heterogeneous population of patients and surgeries. Risk standardization models that adjust for patient and procedural characteristics can allow for collective study of these disparate patients and procedures.

Objectives: We sought to develop a risk-adjustment model for CHS using the newly developed Risk Stratification for Congenital Heart Surgery for ICD-10 Administrative Data (RACHS-2) methodology.

Methods: Within the Kids' Inpatient Database 2019, we identified all CHSs that could be assigned a RACHS-2 score. Hierarchical logistic regression (clustered on hospital) was used to identify patient and procedural characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality. Model validation was performed using data from 24 State Inpatient Databases during 2017.

Results: Of 5,902,538 total weighted hospital discharges in the Kids' Inpatient Database 2019, 22,310 pediatric cardiac surgeries were identified and assigned a RACHS-2 score. In-hospital mortality occurred in 543 (2.4%) of cases. Using only RACHS-2, the mortality mode had a C-statistic of 0.81 that improved to 0.83 with the addition of age. A final multivariable model inclusive of RACHS-2, age, payer, and presence of a complex chronic condition outside of congenital heart disease further improved model discrimination to 0.87 (P < 0.001). Discrimination in the validation cohort was also very good with a C-statistic of 0.83.

Conclusions: We created and validated a risk-adjustment model for CHS that accounts for patient and procedural characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality available in administrative data, including the newly developed RACHS-2. Our risk model will be critical for use in health services research and quality improvement initiatives.

Keywords: congenital heart surgery; outcomes; risk-adjustment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Jayaram is supported by a K23 Career Development Award (K23HL153895) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr Anderson is supported by an R01 (R01HL150044) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr Woo has received research support from the Stanley Manne Children’s Research Institute. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Calibration Plot in the Validation Cohort.
Calibration was assessed in the validation cohort (e.g., agreement between observed outcomes and predictions). The plot had a slope of 0.98 (standard error [SE] 0.05; p-value [for difference from 1]= 0.68) and an intercept of 0.003 (SE 0.002; p-value [for difference from 0]= 0.28).
Central Illustration.
Central Illustration.. Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality and Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve for the Final Multivariable Model.
The final multivariable model inclusive of RACHS-2 category, patient age, insurance provider, and complex chronic condition category showed excellent discrimination with a model C-statistic of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.89).

Comment in

References

    1. Krasuski RA, Bashore TM. Congenital Heart Disease Epidemiology in the United States: Blindly Feeling for the Charging Elephant. Circulation. Jul 12 2016;134(2):110–3. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023370 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oster ME, Lee KA, Honein MA, Riehle-Colarusso T, Shin M, Correa A. Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. May 2013;131(5):e1502–8. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3435 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russo CA, Elixhauser A. Hospitalizations for Birth Defects, 2004. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. 2006. - PubMed
    1. Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K, Newburger JW, Spray TL, Moller JH, Iezzoni LI. Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Jan 2002;123(1):110–8. doi:10.1067/mtc.2002.119064 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen P, Zafar F, Mi J, et al. Risk Stratification for Congenital Heart Surgery for ICD-10 Administrative Data (RACHS-2). J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 8 2022;79(5):465–478. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.036 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources