Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):2361.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17101-9.

Health and wellbeing outcomes associated with loneliness for people with disability: a scoping review

Jodie Bailie  1   2 , Glenda M Bishop  3 , Hannah Badland  4 , Eric Emerson  5   6 , Zoe Aitken  3 , Roger Stancliffe  5 , Kanchana Ekanayake  7 , Gwynnyth Llewellyn  5
Affiliations

Health and wellbeing outcomes associated with loneliness for people with disability: a scoping review

Jodie Bailie et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Loneliness is a significant public health concern due to its detrimental impact on health and wellbeing. Despite people with disability reporting higher levels of loneliness than the general population, there has been little research into how this is affecting their health and wellbeing. In light of this, the aim of our study was to scope both the existing evidence about the health and wellbeing outcomes associated with loneliness for people with disability, as well as the conceptual frameworks and measures utilised in this field of research.

Methods: To conduct this scoping review, we followed the methodology outlined by JBI and searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Informit, Embase, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed, English-language articles published between 1 January 2000 and 8 February 2023. Two independent reviewers completed screening, full-text review and data extraction, with consensus sought at each stage. Data were analysed using content analysis and presented both numerically and narratively.

Results: Out of the initial 1602 publications identified in the scoping review, only nine were included after duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, and full-text review. This limited number of studies, with the earliest study one published in 2015, represents a key finding. Eight of the nine studies were quantitative, and all were conducted in high income countries. Most of these studies utilised a version of the University of Los Angles Loneliness Scale to measure loneliness and addressed specific impairment groups. Notably, most of the studies identified associations between loneliness and health and wellbeing outcomes for people with disability.

Conclusions: This scoping review highlights the current scarcity of studies examining the effect that loneliness has on the health and wellbeing outcomes of people with disability. As most of the reviewed studies relied on loneliness measures designed for individuals without disability, they potentially overlook the unique life experiences of people with disability. Given that loneliness is an international public health concern, it is imperative that people with disability are not left behind or overlooked in efforts to address the impact of loneliness on health and wellbeing.

Keywords: Disability; Health; Loneliness; Scoping review; Wellbeing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) selection of sources of evidence flow diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Badcock JC, Holt-Lunstad J, Garcia,E, Bombaci P, & Lim MH. Position Statement: Addressing Social Isolation and Loneliness and the Power of Human Connection. Global Initiative on Loneliness and Connection (GILC). 2022. Available at: <https://www.gilc.global/general-6Accessed 5 Sept 2023.
    1. Masi CM, Chen HY, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(3):219–266. doi: 10.1177/1088868310377394. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lim MH, Eres R, Vasan S. Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020;55(7):793–810. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fried L, Prohaska T, Burholt V, et al. A unified approach to loneliness. Lancet. 2020;395(10218):114. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32533-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Surkalim DL, Luo M, Eres R, et al. The prevalence of loneliness across 113 countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022;376:e067068. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067068. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types