Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Mar 20;78(3):562-572.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad709.

Treatment for First Cytomegalovirus Infection Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in the AURORA Trial: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial Comparing Maribavir With Valganciclovir

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Treatment for First Cytomegalovirus Infection Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in the AURORA Trial: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial Comparing Maribavir With Valganciclovir

Genovefa A Papanicolaou et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Neutropenia may limit the use of valganciclovir treatment for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). A phase 2 study indicated efficacy of maribavir with fewer treatment-limiting toxicities than valganciclovir.

Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients with first asymptomatic CMV infection post-HCT were stratified and randomized 1:1 to maribavir 400 mg twice daily or valganciclovir (dose-adjusted for renal clearance) for 8 weeks with 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint was confirmed CMV viremia clearance at week 8 (primary hypothesis of noninferiority margin of 7.0%). The key secondary endpoint was a composite of the primary endpoint with no findings of CMV tissue-invasive disease at week 8 through week 16. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed.

Results: Among patients treated (273 maribavir; 274 valganciclovir), the primary endpoint of noninferiority of maribavir was not met (maribavir, 69.6%; valganciclovir, 77.4%; adjusted difference: -7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -14.98, -.36; lower limit of 95% CI of treatment difference exceeded -7.0%). At week 16, 52.7% and 48.5% of patients treated (maribavir and valganciclovir, respectively) maintained CMV viremia clearance without tissue-invasive disease (adjusted difference: 4.4%; 95% CI: -3.91, 12.76). With maribavir (vs valganciclovir), fewer patients experienced neutropenia (16.1% and 52.9%) or discontinued due to TEAEs (27.8% and 41.2%). Discontinuations were mostly due to neutropenia (maribavir, 4.0%; valganciclovir, 17.5%).

Conclusions: Although noninferiority of maribavir to valganciclovir for the primary endpoint was not achieved based on the prespecified noninferiority margin, maribavir demonstrated comparable CMV viremia clearance during post-treatment follow-up, with fewer discontinuations due to neutropenia. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02927067 [AURORA].

Keywords: cytomegalovirus; hematopoietic cell transplant; maribavir; valganciclovir.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflicts of interest. G. A. P.—research funding (paid to their institution): Merck, Takeda; consulting fees: Merck, Symbio, Takeda; honoraria: Merck; data safety monitoring board or advisory board: AlloVir, Armata, Vera; chair (voluntary): Transplant Infectious Disease of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT). R. K. A.—study/grant support (paid to their institution): AiCuris, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Chimerix, Merck, Oxford Immunotec, Qiagen, Regeneron, Takeda. C. C.—study/grant support (paid to their institution): Merck Sharp & Dohme, Takeda; consulting fees: Takeda; honoraria (personal): Takeda, Merck Sharp & Dohme. R. F. D.—consulting fees (advisor honoraria): Cidara, Gilead Sciences, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Omeros Corporation, Sobi; honoraria (speaker’s bureau): Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Omeros Corporation, Takeda; support for attending meetings and/or travel: Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Omeros Corporation, Pfizer; receipt of equipment and materials: Roche Diagnostics. S. H.—honoraria (advisory board): Takeda. J. M.—honoraria (speaker) and advisory board participation: Takeda; consulting fees: F2G, Gilead Sciences, Mundipharma, Pfizer; honoraria: F2G, Gilead Sciences, Mundipharma, Pfizer; support for attending meetings and/or travel: F2G, Gilead Sciences, Mundipharma; data safety monitoring board or advisory board: Cidara, F2G, Gilead Sciences, Mundipharma, Takeda. C. S.—honoraria (speaker): GSK, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer; support for attending meetings and/or travel to American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting: Kite Pharma, a Gilead company. J.-A. H. Y.—trial reimbursement (paid to their institution): Takeda; Editor in Chief (completed 30 June 2022): Clinical Microbiology Reviews; Associate Editor (unpaid): Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. M. F., J. W.—employee and stock/stock options: Takeda. R. A. M.—employee: Takeda. D. J. W.—research grants: Ansun Biopharma, Cidara, Symbio, Takeda; consulting fees: Shire, ViroPharma. K. S. P. reports no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design. Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; BL, baseline; Rand, randomization. aUnless dose adjustment was required for renal impairment. bVisit 2A was required only for patients receiving tacrolimus, cyclosporine, everolimus, or sirolimus at baseline.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient disposition at enrollment, randomization, and follow-up. Percentages are based on the number of patients randomized per arm as the denominator (maribavir, n = 276; valganciclovir, n = 277). In the maribavir arm, the reasons for the 3 patients who were randomized but not dosed were withdrawal from the study (n = 2) and adverse event due to neutropenia (n = 1). In the valganciclovir arm, the reasons for the 3 patients who were randomized but not dosed were withdrawal from the study (n = 2) and other (1 patient was randomized by interactive response technology by error). Abbreviations: CMV, cytomegalovirus; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; N, number of patients enrolled; n, number of patients through trial; PCR, polymerase chain reaction. aOther reasons for treatment discontinuation in the maribavir arm included patient decision (n = 1), poor condition of the patient (n = 1), negative CMV virology (n = 1), difficulties in swallowing (n = 1), investigator decision (n = 1), and starting another treatment for BK virus with a prohibited medication (n = 1). bOther reasons for study discontinuation in the maribavir arm included patient request (n = 2), COVID-19 pandemic (n = 1), misinterpretation of the protocol by site staff (n = 1), poor condition of the patient (n = 1), and COVID-19 infection (n = 1). cOther reasons for treatment discontinuation in the valganciclovir arm included investigator decision due to negative CMV PCR or favorable CMV levels (n = 4), unspecified investigator decision (n = 1), investigator decision due to patient hospitalization (n = 1), issue with study drug dispensing/assignment (n = 1), persistent cytopenias (n = 1), patient decision (n = 1), and investigator decision due to treatment being no longer clinically necessary (n = 1). dOther reasons for study discontinuation in the valganciclovir arm included reason unknown (n = 1), screen failure (n = 1), patient decision (n = 1), and physician decision due to a third reactivation of CMV (n = 1).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Confirmed CMV viremia clearance at week 8 (primary endpoint) and prespecified subgroup analyses of confirmed CMV viremia clearance at week 8 by treatment arm (Modified Randomized Population). The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel weighted average approach was used for the adjusted difference in proportion (maribavir−valganciclovir) and the corresponding 95% CI, adjusting for acute GVHD and baseline plasma CMV DNA concentration. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CMV, cytomegalovirus; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; N, number of patients in a treatment arm; n, number of responders; NA, not applicable.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Maintenance of confirmed CMV viremia clearance with no clinical findings of tissue-invasive disease achieved at week 8 through weeks 12, 16 (key secondary endpoint), and 20 (Modified Randomized Population). Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CMV, cytomegalovirus; N, number of patients in a treatment arm; n, number of responders.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Cumulative probability of first CMV viremia clearance at any time on study by treatment arm (Modified Randomized Population). Abbreviation: CMV, cytomegalovirus.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Percentage of patients with confirmed CMV viremia clearance by study week and treatment arm (Modified Randomized Population; post hoc analysis). A post hoc analysis of patients with confirmed CMV viremia clearance by study week for the 2 treatment arms was performed by calculating the proportion of patients with CMV DNA below the lower limit of quantification at that visit and consecutive prior visits spanning 5 days (ie, confirmed viremia clearance by central laboratory) for each treatment arm. Abbreviation: CMV, cytomegalovirus.

References

    1. Ljungman P, de la Camara R, Robin C, et al. Guidelines for the management of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with haematological malignancies and after stem cell transplantation from the 2017 European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL 7). Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19:e260–72. - PubMed
    1. Azevedo LS, Pierrotti LC, Abdala E, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2015; 70:515–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peffault De Latour R, Chevallier P, Blaise D, et al. Clinical and economic impact of treated CMV infection in adult CMV-seropositive patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Med Virol 2020; 92:3665–73. - PubMed
    1. Jakharia N, Howard D, Riedel DJ. CMV infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: prevention and treatment strategies. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis 2021; 13:123–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ota R, Hirata A. Relationship between renal dysfunction and electrolyte abnormalities in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients treated with foscarnet. J Chemother 2021; 33:539–46. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data