Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Jan;103(1):105-116.
doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05552-4. Epub 2023 Dec 1.

A multicenter phase Ib trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms or acute myeloid leukemia refractory to hypomethylating agents

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A multicenter phase Ib trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms or acute myeloid leukemia refractory to hypomethylating agents

Jan Philipp Bewersdorf et al. Ann Hematol. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with hypomethylating agent failure have a poor prognosis. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) can contribute to MDS progression and mediate resistance to anti-PD1 therapy. As histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) decrease MDSCs in preclinical models, we conducted an investigator-initiated, NCI-Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored, multicenter, dose escalation, and expansion phase Ib trial (NCT02936752) of the HDACi entinostat and the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab. Twenty-eight patients (25 MDS and 3 AML) were enrolled. During dose escalation (n=13 patients), there was one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) on dose level (DL) 1 (G5 pneumonia/bronchoalveolar hemorrhage) and two DLTs at DL 2 (G3 pharyngeal mucositis and G3 anorexia). Per the 3 + 3 dose escalation design, DL 1 (entinostat 8 mg PO days 1 and 15 + pembrolizumab 200 mg IV day 1 every 21 days) was expanded and another 15 patients were enrolled. Hematologic adverse events (AEs) were common. The most common non-hematologic ≥G3 AEs were infection (32%), hypoxia/respiratory failure (11%), and dyspnea (11%). There were no protocol-defined responses among the 28 patients enrolled. Two patients achieved a marrow complete remission (mCR). Using a systems immunology approach with mass cytometry and machine learning analysis, mCR patients had increased classical monocytes and macrophages but there was no significant change of MDSCs. In conclusion, combining entinostat with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced MDS and AML was associated with limited clinical efficacy and substantial toxicity. Absence of an effect on MDSCs could be a potential explanation for the limited efficacy of this combination. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT02936752.

Keywords: AML; Entinostat; MDS; Myeloid-derived suppressor cells; Pembrolizumab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: RMS received honoraria from BMS and Gilead. AY had an advisory role for Incyte, CTI Pharma, Pharmaessentia, Pfizer, Novartis, ACCELERON PHARMA, Servier, AbbVie, Apellis, Gilead, Notable Labs and Celgene. JFZ received research funding from AbbVie, Gilead, Arog, Astex, Jazz, Merck, Stemline, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Syndax, and Takeda and had a consultancy/received honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Genentech, Gilead, Immunogen, Servier, and Shattuck Labs. JKA was a member of Data Monitoring Committee for GlycoMimetics and a had consulting or Advisory Role for AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, BioSight, Bluebird Bio, Curio, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Kura Oncology, Kymera, MDEducation, Rigel, Stemline Therapeutics, Syros. JKA received research funding (all to Institution) from AbbVie, Agios, ALX Oncology, Amgen, Amphivena, Aprea AB, Aptose Biosciences, Astellas, Pharma,BioSight, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Cyclacel, Fujifilm, Immunogen, Kartos Therapeutics, Kura Oncology, Loxo, and Pfizer. YFM has received honoraria/consulting fees from Kura Oncology, BluePrint Medicines, GERON, OncLive and MD Education. YFM participated in advisory boards and received honoraria from Sierra Oncology, Stemline Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines, Morphosys, Taiho Oncology, Rigel Pharmaceuticals and Novartis. YFM received travel reimbursement from Blueprint Medicines, MD Education, and Morphosys. NAP received consulting fees from Pfizer, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint Medicines, Incyte, Novartis, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, CTI BioPharma, PharmaEssentia, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, and AbbVie; other financial support for serving on an Independent Data Review Committee for Cogent Biosciences. OO had a consultancy with Abbvie; Impact Biomedicines; Celgene; Novartis; BMS; Taiho Pharmaceutical; CTI; Threadwell therapeutics; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene and received research funding (all to the institution) from Celgene, Incyte, Astex Pharmaceuticals, NS Pharma, Abbvie, Janssen Oncology, OncoTherapy Science, Agios, AstraZeneca, CTI BioPharma Corp, Kartos Therapeutics, Aprea AB. SH had a consultancy with Forma Therapeutics. TKK received research funding from Nextcure and had a consultancy with Agenus. AMZ participated in advisory boards, and/or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from AbbVie, Pfizer, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Servier, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Geron, Taiho, Seattle Genetics, Otsuka, BeyondSpring, Takeda, Ionis, Amgen, Janssen, Genentech, Epizyme, Syndax, Gilead, Kura, Chiesi, ALX Oncology, BioCryst, Notable, Orum, Mendus, Zentalis, Schrodinger, Regeneron, Syros, and Tyme. None of these relationships was related to the content of this manuscript. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mass cytometric analysis reveals changes in the bone marrow of patients over the course of treatment with entinostat and pembrolizumab. A.T-REX (Tracking Responders Expanding) analysis of all cells from six patients is shown. A central UMAP dimensionality reduction plot, performed only using cell surface markers, shaded by T-REX change depicts phenotypically similar cells in regions of great expansion (dark red, ≥95% from EOC3) or great contraction (dark blue, ≥95% from pre-) over time following treatment with entinostat and pembrolizumab. Red or blue population interpretations are shown for major expanding or contracting populations identified by T-REX. Boxes indicate clusters of similar cells identified by T-REX, with marker enrichment modelling (MEM) labels inside each box providing a phenotypic description of these clusters. All measured features were included in MEM labels, which only show features enriched by at least +4 or more on a scale from 0 to 10. A traditional immune cell identity is assigned by an expert to each cluster or group of clusters (large text above boxes). B. Individual dimensionality reduction (UMAP) plots compare the global bone marrow signature before and at the end of cycle three of therapy. mCR: marrow complete remission, SD: stable disease, PD: progression of disease
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Changes in abundance of biaxially gated MDSC subsets in patient bone marrow over the course of treatment with entinostat and pembrolizumab. MDSC subsets are defined as lineage negative/CD11b+/HLA-DRlow/CD66b+ (granulocytic MDSCs) or lineage negative/CD11b+/HLA-DRlow/CD14+ (monocytic MDSCs). MDSCs were generally stable over the course of therapy, with generally modest decreases of the granulocytic phenotype. Two patients, patient 3 and patient 6, had marked increases in monocytic MDSCs in their bone marrow over the course of treatment. Changes in abundance major immune lineages in patient bone marrow over the course of treatment with entinostat and pembrolizumab. A general decrease in detection of T and NK cells is observed, especially CXCR5+ T follicular helper cells (Tfh).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Santini V, Finelli C, Giagounidis A, Schoch R, Gattermann N, Sanz G, List A, Gore SD, Seymour JF, Bennett JM, Byrd J, Backstrom J, Zimmerman L, McKenzie D, Beach C, Silverman LR, International Vidaza High-Risk MDSSSG (2009) Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol 10 (3):223–232. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70003-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zeidan AM, Stahl M, Hu X, Wang R, Huntington SF, Podoltsev NA, Gore SD, Ma X, Davidoff AJ (2018) Long-term survival of older patients with MDS treated with HMA therapy without subsequent stem cell transplantation. Blood 131 (7):818–821. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-10-811729 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sekeres MA, Othus M, List AF, Odenike O, Stone RM, Gore SD, Litzow MR, Buckstein R, Fang M, Roulston D, Bloomfield CD, Moseley A, Nazha A, Zhang Y, Velasco MR, Gaur R, Atallah E, Attar EC, Cook EK, Cull AH, Rauh MJ, Appelbaum FR, Erba HP (2017) Randomized Phase II Study of Azacitidine Alone or in Combination With Lenalidomide or With Vorinostat in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: North American Intergroup Study SWOG S1117. J Clin Oncol 35 (24):2745–2753. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.66.2510 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prébet T, Gore SD, Esterni B, Gardin C, Itzykson R, Thepot S, Dreyfus F, Rauzy OB, Recher C, Adès L, Quesnel B, Beach CL, Fenaux P, Vey N (2011) Outcome of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome after azacitidine treatment failure. J Clin Oncol 29 (24):3322–3327. doi:10.1200/jco.2011.35.8135 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nazha A, Sekeres MA, Komrokji R, Steensma DP, Kantarjian H, Roboz G, Fenaux P, Prebet T, Azarnia N, Zbyszewski PS, Fruchtman SM, Santini V, Silverman LR, Platzbecker U, Garcia-Manero G (2017) Validation of a post-hypomethylating agent failure prognostic model in myelodysplastic syndromes patients treated in a randomized controlled phase III trial of rigosertib vs. best supportive care. Blood Cancer J 7 (12):644–644. doi:10.1038/s41408-017-0018-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data