Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 30;55(1):84.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00845-8.

Genetic correlations of direct and indirect genetic components of social dominance with fitness and morphology traits in cattle

Affiliations

Genetic correlations of direct and indirect genetic components of social dominance with fitness and morphology traits in cattle

Beniamino Tuliozi et al. Genet Sel Evol. .

Abstract

Background: Within the same species, individuals show marked variation in their social dominance. Studies on a handful of populations have indicated heritable genetic variation for this trait, which is determined by both the genetic background of the individual (direct genetic effect) and of its opponent (indirect genetic effect). However, the evolutionary consequences of selection for this trait are largely speculative, as it is not a usual target of selection in livestock populations. Moreover, studying social dominance presents the challenge of working with a phenotype with a mean value that cannot change in the population, as for every winner of an agonistic interaction there will necessarily be a loser. Thus, to investigate what could be the evolutionary response to selection for social dominance, it is necessary to focus on traits that might be correlated with it. This study investigated the genetic correlations of social dominance, both direct and indirect, with several morphology and fitness traits. We used a dataset of agonistic contests involving cattle (Bos taurus): during these contests, pairs of cows compete in ritualized interactions to assess social dominance. The outcomes of 37,996 dominance interactions performed by 8789 cows over 20 years were combined with individual data for fertility, mammary health, milk yield and morphology and analysed using bivariate animal models including indirect genetic effects.

Results: We found that winning agonistic interactions has a positive genetic correlation with more developed frontal muscle mass, lower fertility, and poorer udder health. We also discovered that the trends of changes in the estimated breeding values of social dominance, udder health and more developed muscle mass were consistent with selection for social dominance in the population.

Conclusions: We present evidence that social dominance is genetically correlated with fitness traits, as well as empirical evidence of the possible evolutionary trade-offs between these traits. We show that it is feasible to estimate genetic correlations involving dyadic social traits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Genetic trends for the direct and indirect components of social dominance. Genetic trend for the direct and indirect genetic components of social dominance from 2000 and 2014. The average annual estimated breeding values (EBV) and standard error of the mean are represented. There was an increase in the EBV for the direct component of dominance, and an opposite decrease for the indirect component
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Genetic trends for life history and morphology traits. Genetic trends for life history and morphology traits from 2000 to 2014–2016 (depending on the trait). The average annual estimated breeding values (EBV) and standard error of the mean are represented

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Farine DR, Montiglio PO, Spiegel O. From individuals to groups and back: the evolutionary implications of group phenotypic composition. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015;30:609–621. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.07.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey NW, Marie-Orleach L, Moore AJ. Indirect genetic effects in behavioral ecology: does behavior play a special role in evolution? Behav Ecol. 2018;13:1–11. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arx127. - DOI
    1. Moore AJ, Brodie ED, III, Wolf JB. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution. 1997;51:1352–1362. doi: 10.2307/2411187. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baud A, McPeek S, Chen N, Hughes KA. Indirect genetic effects: a cross-disciplinary perspective on empirical studies. J Hered. 2022;113:1–15. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esab059. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Germain R, Wolak M, Arcese P, Losdat S, Reid J. Direct and indirect genetic and fine-scale location effects on breeding date in song sparrows. J Anim Ecol. 2016;85:1613–1624. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12575. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources