Laryngeal office-based procedures: A safe approach

Abstract

Purpose: Laryngeal surgeries using a flexible nasopharyngoscope equipped with an operative channel has gained popularity, with gradual increase in the variety of interventional office-based procedures, under local anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to analyze the tolerance of such procedures.

Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort study. 337 cases were performed during 2 years. We collected the following data: type of pathology, type of procedure and modalities of anesthesia, adverse events.

Results: 19 % of the visits were for the purpose of Biopsy, 65 % for an injection, and Trublue Laser was utilized in 12 % of the procedures. Regarding the pathologies, 27 % were vocal fold paralysis, 18 % leukoplakia or another suspicious lesion, 15 % recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, 13 % neuromuscular disorder, 9 % vocal fold scarring, 7 % vocal cord atrophy and 6 % had an inflammatory presentation. Side effects were documented in 26 visits (7.7 %) and were minor in almost all the encounters: they included strong reflexive cough, deep throat pain, discomfort, gag reflex, anxiety, vagal discomfort, malaise, hypersalivation, nose pain, labile hypertension. More severe side effects were very rare and included septal wound and epistaxis, erythematous rash, dyspnea, and transient dysarthria. 13 procedures were either aborted, or canceled at initial steps, due to inability of the patient to tolerate the procedure and were rescheduled for general anesthesia. 97 % of the cases were released home after 1 h of surveillance.

Conclusion: Office-based flexible interventional laryngoscopy under local anesthesia is a safe and well-tolerated procedure, with abundance of various interventions feasible on ambulatory, office-based setup.

Keywords: Benign vocal fold lesions; Biopsy; In-office procedures; Laser; Medialization.