Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 2;19(1):57.
doi: 10.1186/s13002-023-00630-3.

Ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review

Affiliations
Review

Ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review

Jimlea Nadezhda Mendoza et al. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. .

Abstract

Background: Ethnobotanical knowledge about the role of plants in fisheries provides valuable ecological information vital for sustainable management of local resources; however, it is diluted and understudied globally. This literature review aims to map the knowledge of plant use within traditional fishing communities.

Methods: Through the PRISMA method, we identified and selected 34 articles reporting the use of plants in fisheries, and including 344 taxa of plants and algae. Uses of plants and algae were grouped into different categories.

Results: In the novel categorization of fishery-related uses we proposed, the most mentioned were for fishing and building/repair of fishing artifacts and habitat-related uses, while the records of plants related to fiber uses, providing aid in fishing management and species causing problems, were among the least mentioned. Semi-structured interview is most commonly used with local resource users, especially fishery experts, in exploring perceptions on plant use within traditional fishing communities. Diversity was high in all the recorded families, but most were reported locally.

Conclusion: Ethnobotanical studies with fishers are not common in the documented literature but they provide a large number of use reports. On the basis this review, in most of the world, the information is of a casual and sporadic nature. Fishers can provide information on aquatic plants and algae that create problems and aid in fishing management, which are crucial in understanding the ecosystem of a region experiencing environmental challenges. This knowledge is greatly understudied globally and undergoing a rapid decline, as highlighted in several of the reviewed articles. Thus, further systematic research on fishery-related uses of plants by fisherfolk is needed considering its potential contribution to the sustainable management of fishery resources.

Keywords: Ethnobiology; Fisherfolk; Indigenous plant knowledge; Local ecological knowledge; Plant uses; Traditional ecological knowledge; Traditional fisheries knowledge; Traditional plant knowledge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for the literature review with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of the publication year of the studies included in the review
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution of the reviewed articles on the world map, red stars mean original reasearch, black stars mean original research combined with other data sources Source of the base map: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/A_large_blank_world_map_with_oceans_marked_in_blue.PNG
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The methods of data acquisition reported in the included articles
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Knowledge sources reported in reviewed articles
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Percentage of use reports from ethnobotanical studies with local fishers globally
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Frequency of reports on fishery-related uses of plants in reviewed articles per geographical area
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
General categories of fishery-related uses of plants in the world
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Bar graph of the most frequently reported families in all the reviewed studies, indicating the number of reports per family
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Shared species used within genera across countries

References

    1. Savo V, La Rocca A, Caneva G, Rapallo F, Cornara L. Plants used in artisanal fisheries on the Western Mediterranean coasts of Italy. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:1–4. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-9-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quave CL, Pieroni A. A reservoir of ethnobotanical knowledge informs resilient food security and health strategies in the Balkans. Nat Plants. 2015;1(2):1–6. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2014.21. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gómez-Baggethun E, Reyes-García V, Olsson P, Montes C. Traditional ecological knowledge and community resilience to environmental extremes: a case study in Doñana, SW Spain. Global Environ Change. 2012;22(3):640–650. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.02.005. - DOI
    1. Berlin B. Ethnobiological classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2014.
    1. Gadgil M, Berkes F, Folke C. Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio. 1993;1:151–156. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources