Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct-Dec;27(4):e2023.00039.
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00039.

Energy Device Preferences Among Gynecologic Surgeons

Affiliations

Energy Device Preferences Among Gynecologic Surgeons

Lulu Yu et al. JSLS. 2023 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Multiple vessel-sealing devices are available for use during laparoscopy. The objective of this study is to determine what surgeon-level and device characteristics influence the choice of advanced energy device during gynecologic laparoscopy.

Methods: This is a national cross-sectional study of gynecologic surgeons conducted via social media, utilizing an online, publicly-available, anonymous survey. Gynecologic surgeons who had completed residency training were approached for participation in the survey. Survey completion was voluntary and involved no further follow-ups. The web-based survey consisted of six questions with the option to answer three additional questions if time permitted. The institutional review board determined that this study qualified for exemption.

Results: There were 92 respondents who participated in the survey. Of these, 81 completed the survey and were included in the analysis. Female respondents were younger and more frequently reported a glove size of 6.5 or less. Surgeon-level characteristics, including gender, age, glove size, case volume, region, and practice setting, were not significantly associated with preferred energy devices. Device availability in the operating room was the only characteristic associated with preferred energy devices (P-value = .0076). Other device-level characteristics such as optimal thermal spread, reduced plume, ease of use, device reliability, and teachability had no statistically significant association with preferred energy devices.

Conclusion: Multiple advanced energy devices are available for use during gynecologic laparoscopy. These devices have varying energy profiles, thermal spread, and device size. Despite this diversity, only device availability in the operating room influenced the surgeon's preferred device selection.

Keywords: Energy devices; Ergonomics; Gynecology; Laparoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interests: none.

References

    1. Jaiswal A, Huang KG. Energy devices in gynecological laparoscopy - archaic to modern era. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2017;6(4):147–151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holloran-Schwartz MB, Gavard JA, Martin JC, Blaskiewicz RJ, Yeung PP., Jr. Single-use energy sources and operating room time for laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(1):72–77. - PubMed
    1. Shiber LJ, Ginn DN, Jan A, Gaskins JT, Biscette SM, Pasic R. Comparison of industry-leading energy devices for use in gynecologic laparoscopy: articulating ENSEAL versus LigaSure energy devices. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(3):467–473.e1. - PubMed
    1. Aytan H, Nazik H, Narin R, Api M, Tok EC. Comparison of the use of LigaSure, HALO PKS cutting forceps, and ENSEAL tissue sealer in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(4):650–655. - PubMed
    1. Wong JMK, Moore KJ, Lewis P, Reid M, Saul K, Carey ET. Ergonomic assessment of surgeon characteristics and laparoscopic device strain in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(12):1357–1363. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources