Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Dec 4;23(1):438.
doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-04257-5.

Effect of camel milk on lipid profile among patients with diabetes: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of camel milk on lipid profile among patients with diabetes: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

Narmin Khalid et al. BMC Complement Med Ther. .

Abstract

The effects of camel milk (CM) intake on lipid profile among patients with diabetes remain controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to calculate the effect size of CM intake on blood lipids among patients with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes. We searched nine databases from inception until December 31, 2022, to identify relevant RCTs. Effect sizes for total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were calculated and expressed using mean differences (MD) and confidence intervals (CI). Of 4,054 retrieved articles, 10 RCTs (a total of 347 participants aged 8-70 years, 60.5% male) were eligible for inclusion. The pooled results from a random-effects model showed statistically significant decreases in TC (MD - 21.69, 95% CI: 41.05, - 2.33; p = 0.03; I2=99%), TG (MD - 19.79, 95% CI: -36.16, - 3.42; p=0.02, I2=99%), and LDL (MD -11.92, CI: -20.57, -3.26; p = 0.007, I2=88%), and a significant increase in HDL (MD 10.37, 95% CI, 1.90, 18.84; p=0.02, I2=95%) in patients with diabetes supplemented with CM compared with usual care alone. Subgroup analysis revealed that only long-term interventions (> 6 months) elicited a significant reduction in TC levels and TG levels. Consumption of fresh CM by patients with diabetes resulted in significant reductions in TC, TG, and LDL levels, while showing a significant increase in HDL levels. Patients with T1D elicited a more beneficial effect in lowering TC, LDL, and TG levels and in increasing HDL levels than their corresponding partners with T2D. In conclusion, long-term consumption of CM for patients with diabetes, especially those with T1D, could be a useful adjuvant therapy to improve lipid profile alongside prescribed medications. However, the high heterogeneity in the included studies suggests that more RCTs with larger sample sizes and longer intervention durations are required to improve the robustness of the available evidence.

Keywords: Arabian camel; Camelus dromedarius; Cardiometabolic markers; Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM); Dyslipidemia; Hypercholesterolemia; Milk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart diagram for study selection on the effect of camel milk on lipid profile in patients with diabetes
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of bias risk for each included study (N = 10); (b) risk of bias graph showing the percentage of bias risk for each included study. Green: low bias risk, Yellow: unclear bias risk, and Red: high bias risk
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot for the effect of camel milk intake on total cholesterol (TC)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot for the effect of camel milk intake on triglycerides (TG)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot for the effect of camel milk intake on low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot for the effect of camel milk intake on high-density lipoprotein (HDL)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ong KL, Stafford LK, McLaughlin SA et al. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet. 2023;402(10397):203–234. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leon BM, Maddox TM. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatment recommendations and future research. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(13):1246. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i13.1246. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collaboration ERF. Diabetes Mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular Disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. The Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2215–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruemmer D, Nissen SE. Prevention and management of Cardiovascular Disease in patients with Diabetes: current challenges and opportunities. Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metabolism. 2020;9(3):81. doi: 10.1097/XCE.0000000000000199. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birdee GS, Yeh G. Complementary and alternative medicine therapies for Diabetes: a clinical review. Clin Diabetes. 2010;28(4):147–55. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.28.4.147. - DOI