Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 18;33(11):738-747.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016686.

Health services under pressure: a scoping review and development of a taxonomy of adaptive strategies

Affiliations

Health services under pressure: a scoping review and development of a taxonomy of adaptive strategies

Bethan Page et al. BMJ Qual Saf. .

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review was to develop a taxonomy of pressures experienced by health services and an accompanying taxonomy of strategies for adapting in response to these pressures. The taxonomies were developed from a review of observational studies directly assessing care delivered in a variety of clinical environments.

Design: In the first phase, a scoping review of the relevant literature was conducted. In the second phase, pressures and strategies were systematically coded from the included papers, and categorised.

Data sources: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Scopus) and reference lists from recent reviews of the resilient healthcare literature.

Eligibility criteria: Studies were included from the resilient healthcare literature, which used descriptive methodologies to directly assess a clinical environment. The studies were required to contain strategies for managing under pressure.

Results: 5402 potential articles were identified with 17 papers meeting the inclusion criteria. The principal source of pressure described in the studies was the demand for care exceeding capacity (ie, the resources available), which in turn led to difficult working conditions and problems with system functioning. Strategies for responding to pressures were categorised into anticipatory and on-the-day adaptations. Anticipatory strategies included strategies for increasing resources, controlling demand and plans for managing the workload (efficiency strategies, forward planning, monitoring and co-ordination strategies and staff support initiatives). On-the-day adaptations were categorised into: flexing the use of existing resources, prioritising demand and adapting ways of working (leadership, teamwork and communication strategies).

Conclusions: The review has culminated in an empirically based taxonomy of pressures and an accompanying taxonomy of strategies for adapting in response to these pressures. The taxonomies could help clinicians and managers to optimise how they respond to pressures and may be used as the basis for training programmes and future research evaluating the impact of different strategies.

Keywords: Crisis management; Health services research; Leadership; Patient safety; Risk management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A taxonomy for pressures and their effects on clinical work.
Figure 2
Figure 2. An illustration of how pressures and their effects interrelate.
Figure 3
Figure 3. A taxonomy of strategies for adapting to pressures. The taxonomy includes two broad classes of adaptive strategies: anticipatory strategies to prepare for pressures and on-the-day adaptations to manage immediate pressures.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Simplified conceptual framework to illustrate the pressures and strategies for responding to these pressures.

References

    1. Back J, Ross AJ, Duncan MD, et al. Emergency Department escalation in theory and practice: A mixed-methods study using a model of organizational resilience. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70:659–71. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Son C, Sasangohar F, Rao AH, et al. Resilient performance of emergency Department: patterns, models and strategies. Safety Science. 2019;120:362–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.010. - DOI
    1. Amalberti R, Vincent C. Managing risk in hazardous conditions: improvisation is not enough. BMJ Qual Saf . 2020;29:60–3. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009443. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hybinette K, Pukk Härenstam K, Ekstedt M. A first-line management team’s strategies for sustaining resilience in a specialised intensive care unit—a qualitative observational study. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e040358. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040358. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rasmussen J. Risk management in a dynamic society: a Modelling problem. Safety Science. 1997;27:183–213. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0. - DOI

Publication types