Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 4;38(47):e405.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e405.

Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading

Affiliations
Review

Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading

Alikhan Zhaksylyk et al. J Korean Med Sci. .

Abstract

The concept of research integrity (RI) refers to a set of moral and ethical standards that serve as the foundation for the execution of research activities. Integrity in research is the incorporation of principles of honesty, transparency, and respect for ethical standards and norms throughout all stages of the research endeavor, encompassing study design, data collecting, analysis, reporting, and publishing. The preservation of RI is of utmost importance to uphold the credibility and amplify the influence of scientific research while also preventing and dealing with instances of scientific misconduct. Researchers, institutions, journals, and readers share responsibilities for preserving RI. Researchers must adhere to the highest ethical standards. Institutions have a role in establishing an atmosphere that supports integrity ideals while also providing useful guidance, instruction, and assistance to researchers. Editors and reviewers act as protectors, upholding quality and ethical standards in the dissemination of research results through publishing. Readers play a key role in the detection and reporting of fraudulent activity by critically evaluating content. The struggle against scientific misconduct has multiple dimensions and is continuous. It requires a collaborative effort and adherence to the principles of honesty, transparency, and rigorous science. By supporting a culture of RI, the scientific community may preserve its core principles and continue to contribute appropriately to society's well-being. It not only aids present research but also lays the foundation for future scientific advancements.

Keywords: Ethics in Publishing; Plagiarism; Research Misconduct; Scientific Dishonesty; Scientific Fraud; Scientific Misconduct.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Key elements responsible for scientific misconduct.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Strategies to avoid scientific misconduct.

References

    1. Science Europe. Seven reasons to care about integrity in research. [Updated 2015]. [Accessed October 2, 2023]. https://www.scienceeurope.org/media/42sphgqt/20150617_seven-reasons_web2... .
    1. Dinis-Oliveira RJ. COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science”. Forensic Sci Rev. 2020;5(2):174–187. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Library of Medicine. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) dictionary: ethics. [Updated 2023]. [Accessed October 2, 2023]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68015871 .
    1. Ana J, Koehlmoos T, Smith R, Yan LL. Research misconduct in low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001315. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouter L. What research institutions can do to foster research integrity. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020;26(4):2363–2369. - PMC - PubMed