Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 1;32(6):66-72.
doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000308. Epub 2023 Nov 15.

Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection

Affiliations

Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection

Meltem Uyanik et al. Top Magn Reson Imaging. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to prospectively investigate a novel quantitative biparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol to detect prostate cancer (PCa) in biopsy-naïve men. Secondarily, this study reports the accuracy of fractional order calculus (FROC) diffusion and quantitative T2 compared with the Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS).

Methods: This prospective pilot study (NCT04175730) enrolled 50 prostate biopsy-naïve men who met eligibility criteria. All men received 3T MRI with T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (b-values: 50-4,000 s/mm2). Men with PI-RADS lesions ≥3 underwent targeted and systematic prostate biopsy, omitting systematic biopsy cores in peripheral zone lesions. DWI series images were fit to signal decay to calculate ADC (mm2/s) and the FROC model for coefficient DF (mm2/s). The primary end point was detection of Gleason grade group ≥2 (GG≥2) PCa. Receiver operating characteristic regression and area under the curve (AUC) were reported.

Results: Forty-eight men underwent MRI and biopsy. Mean age was 61.5 years (56-68), 29% were White, 52% were African American, mean PSA was 6.0 ng/mL (4.9-8.0), and mean PSA density was 0.14 ng/mL2. In total, 61 PI-RADS ≥3 lesions were targeted for biopsy. GG≥2 PC was found in 7% (1/14) of PI-RADS 3 lesions, 28% (10/36) of PI-RADS 4 lesions, and 36% (4/11) of PI-RADS 5 lesions. The AUC for detection of GG≥2 PC was 0.63 (0.5-0.76) for PI-RADS, 0.82 (0.68-0.96) for ADC, and 0.87 (0.77-0.97) for the FROC model.

Conclusion: This small prospective pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of a novel quantitative biparametic MRI protocol to detect prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
CONSORT diagram. Patients assessed and included in this study. PZ, peripheral zone; ROI, region of interest; SOC, standard of care; TRUS, transrectal ultrasound-guided; TZ, transition zone.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Representative MRI image heat maps. Sample images from a single patient. β, the fractional order derivative in space; µ, the fractional order calculus model spatial parameter; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; Df, fractional order calculus model diffusion coefficient.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Receiver operator curves of quantitative models and PI-RADS for detection of prostate cancer. (A) All ROI—any cancer, (B) all ROI—high grade cancer, and (C) peripheral zone ROI—any cancer. AUC, area under the curve; ROI, region of interest.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. . Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33. - PubMed
    1. Klotz L, Chin J, Black PC, et al. Comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy with systematic transrectal ultrasonography biopsy for biopsy-naive men at risk for prostate cancer: A phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(4):534–542. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1767–1777. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Norris JM, Carmona Echeverria LM, Bott SRJ, et al. What type of prostate cancer is systematically overlooked by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? An analysis from the PROMIS cohort. Eur Urol. 2020;78(2):163–170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mussi TC, Yamauchi FI, Tridente CF, et al. Interobserver agreement and positivity of PI-RADS version 2 among radiologists with different levels of experience. Acad Radiol. 2019;26(8):1017–1022. - PubMed

Substances