Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography for Detection of Early-Stage Cancers Stratified by Grade: A TOSYMA Subanalysis
- PMID: 38051184
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.231533
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography for Detection of Early-Stage Cancers Stratified by Grade: A TOSYMA Subanalysis
Abstract
Background Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesized mammography (SM) increases invasive tumor detection compared with digital mammography (DM). However, it is not known how the prognostic characteristics of the cancers detected with the two screening approaches differ. Purpose To compare invasive breast cancers detected with DBT plus SM (test arm) versus DM (control arm) screening with regard to tumor stage, histologic grade, patient age, and breast density. Materials and Methods This exploratory subanalysis of the Tomosynthesis plus Synthesized Mammography (TOSYMA) study, which is a multicenter randomized controlled trial embedded in the German mammography screening program, recruited women aged 50-70 years from July 2018 to December 2020. It compared invasive cancer detection rates (iCDRs), rate differences, and odds ratios (ORs) between the arms stratified by Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage (I vs II-IV), histologic grade (1 vs 2 or 3), age group (50-59 vs 60-70 years), and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories of breast density (A or B vs C or D). Results In total, 49 462 (median age, 57 years [IQR, 53-62 years]) and 49 669 (median age, 57 years [IQR, 53-62 years]) participants were allocated to DBT plus SM and DM screening, respectively. The iCDR of stage I tumors with DBT plus SM was 51.6 per 10 000 women (255 of 49 462) and with DM it was 30.0 per 10 000 women (149 of 49 669). DBT plus SM depicted more stage I tumors with grade 2 or 3 (166 of 49 462, 33.7 per 10 000 women) than DM (106 of 49 669, 21.3 per 10 000 women; rate difference, +12.3 per 10 000 women [95% CI: 0.3, 24.9]; OR, 1.6 [95% CI: 0.9, 2.7]). DBT plus SM achieved the highest iCDR of stage I tumors with grade 2 or 3 among women aged 60-70 years with dense breasts (41 of 7364, 55.4 per 10 000 women; rate difference, +21.6 per 10 000 women [95% CI: -21.1, 64.3]; OR, 1.6 [95% CI: 0.6, 4.5]). Conclusion DBT plus SM screening appears to lead to higher detection of early-stage invasive breast cancers of grade 2 or 3 than DM screening, with the highest rate among women aged 60-70 years with dense breasts. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03377036 © RSNA, 2023 See also the editorial by Ha and Chang in this issue.
Similar articles
-
Radiation exposure and screening yield by digital breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography: results of the TOSYMA Trial breast density related.Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):166-176. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10847-9. Epub 2024 Jul 16. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39012526 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Breast Density and Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis.Radiology. 2023 Feb;306(2):e221006. doi: 10.1148/radiol.221006. Epub 2022 Oct 4. Radiology. 2023. PMID: 36194110 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.Radiology. 2020 Dec;297(3):522-531. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201150. Epub 2020 Sep 15. Radiology. 2020. PMID: 32930649 Clinical Trial.
-
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Hologic 3D Mammography Selenia Dimensions System for Use in Breast Cancer Screening: A Single Technology Assessment [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. PMID: 29553669 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
An individual participant data meta-analysis of breast cancer detection and recall rates for digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography population screening.Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Jul;22(5):e647-e654. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 6. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35246389 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of digital breast tomosynthesis on screening performance and interval cancer rates compared to digital mammography: A meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0315466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315466. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39888906 Free PMC article.
-
Radiation exposure and screening yield by digital breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography: results of the TOSYMA Trial breast density related.Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):166-176. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10847-9. Epub 2024 Jul 16. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39012526 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Comparative Analysis of Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Japanese Women.Cureus. 2025 Jul 3;17(7):e87231. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87231. eCollection 2025 Jul. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40755640 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical