Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 5;18(12):e0294180.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294180. eCollection 2023.

Impact of hospital accreditation on quality improvement in healthcare: A systematic review

Affiliations

Impact of hospital accreditation on quality improvement in healthcare: A systematic review

Mohammad J Alhawajreh et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: This is the first systematic review aims to build the evidence for the impact of accreditation on quality improvement of healthcare services, as well as identify and develop an understanding of the contextual factors influencing accreditation implementation in the hospital setting through the lens of Normalisation Process Theory (NPT).

Data sources: Data were gathered from five databases; MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. And supplemental sources.

Study design: This systematic review is reported following PRISMA guidelines with a quality assessment. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis guided by the NPT theoretical framework.

Data collection/extraction methods: Data were extracted and summarized using prespecified inclusion/exclusion criteria and a data extraction sheet encompassing all necessary information about the studies included in the review.

Principal findings: There are inconsistent findings about the impact of accreditation on improving healthcare quality and outcomes, and there is scant evidence about its effectiveness. The findings also provide valuable insights into the key factors that may influence hospital accreditation implementation and develop a better understanding of their potential implications. Using the NPT shows a growing emphasis on the enactment work of the accreditation process and how this may drive improving the quality of healthcare services. However, little focus is given to accreditation's effects on health professionals' roles and responsibilities, strategies and ways for engaging health professionals for effective implementation, and ensuring that the goals and potential benefits of accreditation are made clear and transparent through ongoing evaluation and feedback to all health professionals involved in the accreditation process.

Conclusions: While there are contradictory findings about the impact of accreditation on improving the quality of healthcare services, accreditation continues to gain acceptance internationally as a quality assurance tool to support best practices in evaluating the quality outcomes of healthcare delivered. Policymakers, healthcare organisations, and researchers should proactively consider a set of key factors for the future implementation of accreditation programmes if they are to be effectively implemented and sustained within the hospital setting. Systematic review registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020172390 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=172390.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. This is the Fig 1 PRISMA flow diagram showing the number of articles identified in the literature search and the study selection process.

References

    1. Chassin M. R. Improving the quality of health care: what’s taking so long?. Health Affairs. 2013;32(10), 1761–1765. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0809 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hijazi HH, Harvey HL, Alyahya MS, Alshraideh HA, Al Abdi RM, Parahoo SK. The Impact of Applying Quality Management Practices on Patient Centeredness in Jordanian Public Hospitals: Results of Predictive Modeling. Inquiry. 2018; 55:46958018754739. doi: 10.1177/0046958018754739 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (IOM) To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. P. 21.
    1. World Health Organization. Quality and accreditation in health care services: a global review. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
    1. Shaw C & World Health Organization (WHO). Developing hospital accreditation in Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; ‎2006. ‎. P. 5 https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/107683

Publication types