A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis of High-Impact Articles in Critical Care Nephrology

Abstract

Introduction: Critical care nephrology is a subspecialty that merges critical care and nephrology in response to shared pathobiology, clinical care, and technological innovations. To date, there has been no description of the highest impact articles. Accordingly, we systematically identified high impact articles in critical care nephrology.

Methods: This was a bibliometric analysis. The search was developed by a research librarian. Web of Science was searched for articles published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020. Articles required a minimum of 30 citations, publication in English language, and reporting of primary (or secondary) original data. Articles were screened by two reviewers for eligibility and further adjudicated by three experts. The "Top 100" articles were hierarchically ranked by adjudication, citations in the 2 years following publication and journal impact factor (IF). For each article, we extracted detailed bibliometric data. Risk of bias was assessed for randomized trials by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Analyses were descriptive.

Results: The search yielded 2,805 articles. Following initial screening, 307 articles were selected for full review and adjudication. The Top 100 articles were published across 20 journals (median [IQR] IF 10.6 [8.9-56.3]), 38% were published in the 5 years ending in 2020 and 62% were open access. The agreement between adjudicators was excellent (intraclass correlation, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99). Of the Top 100, 44% were randomized trials, 35% were observational, 14% were systematic reviews, 6% were nonrandomized interventional studies and one article was a consensus document. The risk of bias among randomized trials was low. Common subgroup themes were RRT (42%), AKI (30%), fluids/resuscitation (14%), pediatrics (10%), interventions (8%), and perioperative care (6%). The citations for the Top 100 articles were 175 (95-393) and 9 were cited >1,000 times.

Conclusion: Critical care nephrology has matured as an important subspecialty of critical care and nephrology. These high impact papers have focused largely on original studies, mostly clinical trials, within a few core themes. This list can be leveraged for curricula development, to stimulate research, and for quality assurance.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Bibliometric analysis; Citation; Critical care; Nephrology; Renal-replacement therapy; Systematic review.

Fig. 1.

Flow diagram of paper selection.

Fig. 2.

Summary graph of the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB2) assessments of the randomized clinical trials within the Top 100 papers (n = 43). Bias was assessed in five specific domains: (1) randomization process; (2) deviation(s) from the intended intervention(s); (3) missing outcome data; (4) measurement of the outcome; and (5) selection of the reported result. Risk of bias was qualified as one of low risk, some concerns, or high risk. The overall assessment of bias reflects the summative risk of bias across these domains. Data are presented as a percentage of the 43 clinical trials examined.