Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 5;22(1):246.
doi: 10.1186/s12934-023-02254-4.

Challenges and prospects of yeast-based microbial oil production within a biorefinery concept

Affiliations
Review

Challenges and prospects of yeast-based microbial oil production within a biorefinery concept

María Gallego-García et al. Microb Cell Fact. .

Abstract

Biodiesel, unlike to its fossil-based homologue (diesel), is renewable. Its use contributes to greater sustainability in the energy sector, mainly by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Current biodiesel production relies on plant- and animal-related feedstocks, resulting in high final costs to the prices of those raw materials. In addition, the production of those materials competes for arable land and has provoked a heated debate involving their use food vs. fuel. As an alternative, single-cell oils (SCOs) obtained from oleaginous microorganisms are attractive sources as a biofuel precursor due to their high lipid content, and composition similar to vegetable oils and animal fats. To make SCOs competitive from an economic point of view, the use of readily available low-cost substrates becomes essential. This work reviews the most recent advances in microbial oil production from non-synthetic sugar-rich media, particularly sugars from lignocellulosic wastes, highlighting the main challenges and prospects for deploying this technology fully in the framework of a Biorefinery concept.

Keywords: Biofuel; Biowaste; Circular bioeconomy; Lignocellulose; Microbial oil; Oleaginous yeast.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interest

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Yeast cell factory for microbial oil production and value-add co-products
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Important aspects requiring further investigation towards reaching cost-effective microbial oil production

References

    1. D’Amato D, Bartkowski B, Droste N. Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research. Ambio. 2020;49:1878–96. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. IEA RIEA, Paris. Available from: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ada7af90-e280-46c4-a577-df2e4fb... (accessed on 31 May 2023).
    1. Dong T, Knoshaug EP, Pienkos PT, Laurens LML. Lipid recovery from wet oleaginous microbial biomass for biofuel production: a critical review. Appl Energ. 2016;177:879–95. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.002. - DOI
    1. Abghari A, Chen S. Yarrowia lipolytica as an oleaginous cell factory platform for production of fatty acid-based biofuel and bioproducts. Front Energy Res. 2014;2.
    1. Ma Y, Gao Z, Wang Q, Liu Y. Biodiesels from microbial oils: opportunity and challenges. Bioresour Technol. 2018;263:631–41. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.028. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources