Accuracy of heart rate measured by military-grade wearable ECG monitor compared with reference and commercial monitors
- PMID: 38053265
- DOI: 10.1136/military-2023-002541
Accuracy of heart rate measured by military-grade wearable ECG monitor compared with reference and commercial monitors
Abstract
Introduction: Physiological monitoring of soldiers can indicate combat readiness and performance. Despite demonstrated use of wearable devices for HR monitoring, commercial options lack desired military features. A newly developed OMNI monitor includes desired features such as long-range secure data transmission. This study investigated the accuracy of the OMNI to measure HR via accuracy of R-R interval duration relative to research-grade ECG and commercial products.
Methods: 54 healthy individuals (male/female=37/17, age=22.2±3.6 years, height=173.0±9.1 cm, weight=70.1±11.2 kg) completed a submaximal exercise test while wearing a reference ECG (Biopac) and a randomly assigned chest-based monitor (OMNI, Polar H10, Equivital EQ-02, Zephyr Bioharness 3). All participants also wore two wrist-based photoplethysmography (PPG) devices, Garmin fēnix 6 and Empatica E4. Bland-Altman analyses of agreement, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and root-mean-squared error (RMSE) were used to determine accuracy of the OMNI and commercial devices relative to Biopac. Additionally, a linear mixed-effects model evaluated the effects of device and exercise intensity on agreement.
Results: Chest-based devices showed superior agreement with Biopac for measuring R-R interval compared with wrist-based ones in terms of mean bias, CCC and RMSE, with OMNI demonstrating the best scores on all metrics. Linear mixed-effects model showed no significant main or interaction effects for the chest-based devices. However, significant effects were found for Garmin and Empatica devices (p<0.001) as well as the interaction effects between both Garmin and Empatica and exercise intensity (p<0.001).
Conclusions: Chest-based ECG devices are preferred to wrist-based PPG devices due to superior HR accuracy over a range of exercise intensities, with the OMNI device demonstrating equal, if not superior, performance to other commercial ECG monitors. Additionally, wrist-based PPG devices are significantly affected by exercise intensity as they underestimate HR at low intensities and overestimate HR at high intensities.
Keywords: CARDIOLOGY; Health informatics; Pacing & electrophysiology; SPORTS MEDICINE.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Wrist-Worn and Arm-Worn Wearables for Monitoring Heart Rate During Sedentary and Light-to-Vigorous Physical Activities: Device Validation Study.JMIR Cardio. 2025 Mar 21;9:e67110. doi: 10.2196/67110. JMIR Cardio. 2025. PMID: 40116771 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 11;7(3):e10828. doi: 10.2196/10828. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 30855232 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of Optical Heart Rate Sensing Technology in Wearable Fitness Trackers for Young and Older Adults: Validation and Comparison Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 28;8(4):e14707. doi: 10.2196/14707. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32343255 Free PMC article.
-
Can Wearable Devices Accurately Measure Heart Rate Variability? A Systematic Review.Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2018 Mar 1;60(1):7-20. doi: 10.2478/folmed-2018-0012. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2018. PMID: 29668452
-
The Potential of Wearable Sensors for Detecting Cognitive Rumination: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 23;25(3):654. doi: 10.3390/s25030654. Sensors (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39943293 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Annual Physical Training Plan for Masters +45 Women Half Marathon Athletes: A Guideline Model for Good Practices for Programming Effort Volume and Intensity.Sports (Basel). 2024 Sep 14;12(9):256. doi: 10.3390/sports12090256. Sports (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39330733 Free PMC article.
-
Quality in Question: Assessing the Accuracy of Four Heart Rate Wearables and the Implications for Psychophysiological Research.Psychophysiology. 2025 Feb;62(2):e70004. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70004. Psychophysiology. 2025. PMID: 39905563 Free PMC article.
-
Heart Rate Variability as a Marker of Disease Severity in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Prospective Cohort Study.Pulm Circ. 2025 Mar 31;15(2):e70064. doi: 10.1002/pul2.70064. eCollection 2025 Apr. Pulm Circ. 2025. PMID: 40171396 Free PMC article.
-
Non-Pharmacological Mitigation of Acute Mental Stress-Induced Sympathetic Arousal: Comparison Between Median Nerve Stimulation and Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation.Sensors (Basel). 2025 Feb 23;25(5):1371. doi: 10.3390/s25051371. Sensors (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40096118 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring resting heart rate during daily life using wearable technology: Examining the impact of behavioral context and methodological criteria.Digit Health. 2025 Aug 14;11:20552076251367506. doi: 10.1177/20552076251367506. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40823628 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources