Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 7;2(6):1721-1732.
doi: 10.1039/d3dd00163f. eCollection 2023 Dec 4.

Automated MUltiscale simulation environment

Affiliations

Automated MUltiscale simulation environment

Albert Sabadell-Rendón et al. Digit Discov. .

Abstract

Multiscale techniques integrating detailed atomistic information on materials and reactions to predict the performance of heterogeneous catalytic full-scale reactors have been suggested but lack seamless implementation. The largest challenges in the multiscale modeling of reactors can be grouped into two main categories: catalytic complexity and the difference between time and length scales of chemical and transport phenomena. Here we introduce the Automated MUltiscale Simulation Environment AMUSE, a workflow that starts from Density Functional Theory (DFT) data, automates the analysis of the reaction networks through graph theory, prepares it for microkinetic modeling, and subsequently integrates the results into a standard open-source Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code. We demonstrate the capabilities of AMUSE by applying it to the unimolecular iso-propanol dehydrogenation reaction and then, increasing the complexity, to the pre-commercial Pd/In2O3 catalyst employed for the CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. The results show that AMUSE allows the computational investigation of heterogeneous catalytic reactions in a comprehensive way, providing essential information for catalyst design from the atomistic to the reactor scale level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematics of: (a) heterogeneous catalysis and its main phenomena categorized by time and length scale, (b) AMUSE multiscale modeling workflow for heterogeneous catalysis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. AutoProfLib workflow scheme. First, the optimized adsorption structures are converted to .xyz format. Next, the library encodes the geometric information into a molecular graph. The graph information is translated into a connectivity dictionary, which allows the comparison between all the surface intermediates to obtain the mechanism.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Schematic representation of PyMKM. Taking as input the mechanism and the reaction energies, translated from the reaction energy profile, PyMKM subsequently: (a) recovers the stoichiometric matrix S and calculates the kinetic constants for each elementary step and the net rate, rnet, (b) solves automatically the resulting ordinary differential equations system, being the derivative in time of the surface coverage vector θ, and (c) outputs the rates, selectivity, apparent activation energy and reaction orders.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Results for iso-propanol dehydrogenation. (a) Mechanism found with the AutoProfLib for iso-propanol dehydrogenation, (b) PyMKM estimation for the apparent activation energy of iso-propanol dehydrogenation on Co(0001) and Co(112̄0), and (c) CFD-derived iso-propanol conversion trend as function of time on Co(0001) and Co(112̄0) surfaces, depicted in orange and dark-green respectively.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. CO2 hydrogenation results. (a) Reaction mechanism generated for CPa structure with AutoProfLib, which is general for all In2O3-based catalysts, (b) apparent activation energy (filled bars) and selectivity (dots) towards methanol formation, estimated with PyMKM for all systems, compared to experiments (black bars for apparent activation energy, white dots for selectivity) and previous computational results (blue) for all cases, and (c) CFD selectivity results for Pd(111) (dashed lines) and CPa (full lines) cases.

References

    1. Chorkendorff I. and Niemantsverdriet J. W., Concepts of Modern Catalysis and Kinetics, Wiley, Weinheim, 2003
    1. Salciccioli M. Stamatakis M. Caratzoulas S. Vlachos D. G. A review of multiscale modeling of metal-catalyzed reactions: Mechanism development for complexity and emergent behavior. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011;66:4319–4355. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.050. - DOI
    1. Bruix A. Margraf J. T. Andersen M. Reuter K. First-principles-based multiscale modelling of heterogeneous catalysis. Nat. Catal. 2019;2:659–670. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0298-3. - DOI
    1. Margraf J. T. Jung H. Scheurer C. Reuter K. Exploring catalytic reaction networks with machine learning. Nat. Catal. 2023;6:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41929-023-00921-8. - DOI
    1. Wehinger G. D. Ambrosetti M. Cheula R. Ding Z.-B. Isoz M. Kreitz B. Kuhlmann K. Kutscherauer M. Niyogi K. Poissonnier J. et al., Quo vadis multiscale modeling in reaction engineering?–A perspective. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022;184:39–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.05.030. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources