Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;26(3):101036.
doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.101036. Epub 2023 Dec 3.

Recommendations for risk allele evidence curation, classification, and reporting from the ClinGen Low Penetrance/Risk Allele Working Group

Collaborators, Affiliations

Recommendations for risk allele evidence curation, classification, and reporting from the ClinGen Low Penetrance/Risk Allele Working Group

Ryan J Schmidt et al. Genet Med. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Genetic variants at the low end of the penetrance spectrum have historically been challenging to interpret because their high population frequencies exceed the disease prevalence of the associated condition, leading to a lack of clear segregation between the variant and disease. There is currently substantial variation in the classification of these variants, and no formal classification framework has been widely adopted. The Clinical Genome Resource Low Penetrance/Risk Allele Working Group was formed to address these challenges and promote harmonization within the clinical community.

Methods: The work presented here is the product of internal and community Likert-scaled surveys in combination with expert consensus within the Working Group.

Results: We formally recognize risk alleles and low-penetrance variants as distinct variant classes from those causing highly penetrant disease that require special considerations regarding their clinical classification and reporting. First, we provide a preferred terminology for these variants. Second, we focus on risk alleles and detail considerations for reviewing relevant studies and present a framework for the classification these variants. Finally, we discuss considerations for clinical reporting of risk alleles.

Conclusion: These recommendations support harmonized interpretation, classification, and reporting of variants at the low end of the penetrance spectrum.

Keywords: Association studies; Clinical disease risk assessment; Penetrance; Risk allele; Variant classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Harmonization of Terminology and Classification Across the Penetrance Spectrum.
Risk alleles, low penetrance variants, and high penetrance variants are separated by their associated penetrance (e.g. absolute risk of disease associated with the variant). No definitive quantitative boundaries have yet been determined to separate these variant classes. These classes of variants can also be differentiated by their primary type of genetic evidence and therefore require different classification frameworks. Note that a framework for low penetrance variants has not yet been established. Classification tiers across these frameworks can be harmonized by equivalent confidence based on the supporting evidence. *This publication #,

References

    1. ssing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 2009;461(7265):747–753.10.1038/nature08494 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Senol-Cosar O, Schmidt RJ, Qian E, et al. Considerations for clinical curation, classification, and reporting of low-penetrance and low effect size variants associated with disease risk. Genet Med. 2019;21(12):2765–2773.10.1038/s41436-019-0560-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kujovich JL. Factor V Leiden Thrombophilia. In: Adam, Mirzaa, Pagon, et al., eds. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA)1993.
    1. Thauvin-Robinet C, Munck A, Huet F, et al. The very low penetrance of cystic fibrosis for the R117H mutation: a reappraisal for genetic counselling and newborn screening. J Med Genet. 2009;46(11):752–758.10.1136/jmg.2009.067215 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–424.10.1038/gim.2015.30 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources