Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 1;24(12):e627-e634.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003338. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

Amplitude Integrated Electroencephalography: Simulated Assessment of Neonatal Seizure Detection in PICU Patients

Affiliations

Amplitude Integrated Electroencephalography: Simulated Assessment of Neonatal Seizure Detection in PICU Patients

Laura J MacDarby et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: Amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a mainstay of care in neonatal ICUs; however, knowledge gaps exist in relation to its accuracy for identifying seizures in older children. We aimed to review the diagnostic accuracy of existing neonatal seizure detection criteria for seizure detection in older children in hospital.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: PICU/Neurophysiology Department in Dublin.

Patients: One hundred twenty patients (2 mo to 16 yr old) were chosen from a database of formal 10-20 system, 21-lead electroencephalography recordings (2012-2020), comprising 30 studies with seizures, 90 without.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Electroencephalography studies containing electrographic seizures (ESzs) were annotated to describe number, duration, distribution, and spread. Two-channel aEEG (using leads C3-P3, C4-P4) recordings were generated and independently reviewed by a professional specialist in clinical neurophysiology blinded to outcome and without reference to the raw electroencephalography trace. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with correct seizure identification on aEEG. Median patient age was 6.1 years. Abnormal recordings featured 123 seizures. Status epilepticus (SE) was evident by electroencephalography in 10 cases. Using neonatal criteria, aEEG had a sensitivity of 70% and negative predictive value of 90% for identifying any ESz. Accurate detection of individual seizures was diminished when seizures were very short or occurred during waking. Sensitivity for individual seizures was 81% when seizures less than 1 minute were excluded. aEEG correctly identified SE in 70% of the 10 cases, although ESz were confirmed to be present in 80% of this subpopulation.

Conclusions: aEEG criteria for neonatal seizure identification can be applied with caution to older children and should be supplemented by formal electroencephalography. Seizure identification is better for longer seizures and those arising from sleep. SE is not always recognized by aEEG among older children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. MacDarby L, Healy M, Curley GF, et al.: EEG in the pediatric intensive care unit: An Irish experience. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2021; 38:130–134
    1. Lin JJ, Banwell BL, Berg RA, et al.: Electrographic seizures in children and neonates undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017; 18:249–257
    1. Vlachy J, Jo M, Li Q, et al.: Risk factors for seizures among young children monitored with continuous electroencephalography in intensive care unit: A retrospective study. Front Pediatr. 2018; 6:303
    1. Sansevere AJ, Duncan ED, Libenson MH, et al.: Continuous EEG in pediatric critical care: Yield and efficiency of seizure detection. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017; 34:421–426
    1. Herman ST, Abend NS, Bleck TP, et al.; Critical Care Continuous EEG Task Force of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society: Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, part I: Indications. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015; 32:87–95