Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr 1;25(4):364-374.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003425. Epub 2023 Dec 7.

The Pediatric Data Science and Analytics Subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Network: Use of Supervised Machine Learning Applications in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Research

Affiliations
Review

The Pediatric Data Science and Analytics Subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Network: Use of Supervised Machine Learning Applications in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Research

Julia A Heneghan et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Objective: Perform a scoping review of supervised machine learning in pediatric critical care to identify published applications, methodologies, and implementation frequency to inform best practices for the development, validation, and reporting of predictive models in pediatric critical care.

Design: Scoping review and expert opinion.

Setting: We queried CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCO), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Embase (Elsevier), Ovid Medline, and PubMed for articles published between 2000 and 2022 related to machine learning concepts and pediatric critical illness. Articles were excluded if the majority of patients were adults or neonates, if unsupervised machine learning was the primary methodology, or if information related to the development, validation, and/or implementation of the model was not reported. Article selection and data extraction were performed using dual review in the Covidence tool, with discrepancies resolved by consensus.

Subjects: Articles reporting on the development, validation, or implementation of supervised machine learning models in the field of pediatric critical care medicine.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Of 5075 identified studies, 141 articles were included. Studies were primarily (57%) performed at a single site. The majority took place in the United States (70%). Most were retrospective observational cohort studies. More than three-quarters of the articles were published between 2018 and 2022. The most common algorithms included logistic regression and random forest. Predicted events were most commonly death, transfer to ICU, and sepsis. Only 14% of articles reported external validation, and only a single model was implemented at publication. Reporting of validation methods, performance assessments, and implementation varied widely. Follow-up with authors suggests that implementation remains uncommon after model publication.

Conclusions: Publication of supervised machine learning models to address clinical challenges in pediatric critical care medicine has increased dramatically in the last 5 years. While these approaches have the potential to benefit children with critical illness, the literature demonstrates incomplete reporting, absence of external validation, and infrequent clinical implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Bennett’s and Mayampurath’s institution received funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Drs. Bennett, Dziorny, Kamaleswaran and Mayampurath received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Bennett’s institution received funding from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Dr. Sanchez-Pinto received funding from Celldom, Allyx, and Saccharo. Dr. Martin’s institution received funding from the Children’s Hospital Colorado Research Institute and the Thrasher Research Fund. Dr. Kamaleswaran’s institution received funding from the NIH. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Modeling methods used in the included manuscripts. Articles may have included more than one method, so the total number of methods is greater than the number of articles.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summary of methodology and reporting guidance for predictive modeling work in PCCM

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shah N, Arshad A, Mazer MB, Carroll CL, Shein SL, Remy KE. The use of machine learning and artificial intelligence within pediatric critical care. Pediatr Res. 2023;93(2):405–412. doi:10.1038/s41390-022-02380-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ. 2015;350:g7594. doi:10.1136/bmj.g7594 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leisman DE, Harhay MO, Lederer DJ, et al. Development and Reporting of Prediction Models: Guidance for Authors From Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(5):623–633. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004246 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wiens J, Fackler J. Striking the Right Balance-Applying Machine Learning to Pediatric Critical Care Data. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19(7):672–673. doi:10.1097/PCC.0000000000001578 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fackler JC, Rehman M, Winslow RL. Please Welcome the New Team Member: The Algorithm. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(12):1200–1201. doi:10.1097/PCC.0000000000002149 - DOI - PubMed