Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb;21(1):11-21.
doi: 10.1007/s11897-023-00634-w. Epub 2023 Dec 7.

Sex Differences in Circulating Biomarkers of Heart Failure

Affiliations
Review

Sex Differences in Circulating Biomarkers of Heart Failure

Roopa A Rao et al. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose of revsiew: Evidence is scaling up for sex differences in heart failure; however, clinical relevance of sex-specific differential thresholds for biomarkers is not clearly known. Current ambiguity warrants a further look into the sex-specific studies on cardiac biomarkers and may facilitate understanding of phenotypic presentations, clinical manifestations, and pathophysiologic pathway differences in men and women.

Recent findings: Recent studies have confirmed the fact that females have differential threshold for biomarkers, with lower troponin and higher NT proBNP levels. Ambiguity continues to exist in the clinical relevance of ST-2, Galectin 3, and other biomarkers. Novel biomarkers, proteomic biomarkers, and circulating micro RNAs with machine learning are actively being explored. Biomarkers in HFpEF patients with higher female representation are evolving. In recent clinical trials, sex-related difference in biomarkers is not seen despite therapeutic intervention being more effective in females compared to males. Sex-related difference exists in the expression of biomarkers in health and in various disease states of heart failure. However, this differentiation has not effectively translated into the clinical practice in terms of diagnostic studies or prognostication. Active exploration to bridge the knowledge gap and novel technologies can shed more light in this area.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Heart failure; Sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
    1. Gerber Y, Weston SA, Redfield MM, Chamberlain AM, Manemann SM, Jiang R, Killian JM, Roger VL. A contemporary appraisal of the heart failure epidemic in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2000 to 2010. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(6):996–1004. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0924 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. • Stolfo D, Uijl A, Vedin O, Strömberg A, Faxén UL, Rosano GMC, Sinagra G, Dahlström U, Savarese G. Sex-based differences in heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum: phenotyping, and prognostic and therapeutic implications. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7(6):505–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2019.03.011 . (Erratum.In:JACCHeartFail.2020Apr;8(4):345-346). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lam CS, Carson PE, Anand IS, Rector TS, Kuskowski M, Komajda M, McKelvie RS, McMurray JJ, Zile MR, Massie BM, Kitzman DW. Sex differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in elderly patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (I-PRESERVE) trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5(5):571–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.970061 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and gender differences in heart failure. Int J Heart Fail. 2020;2(3):157–81. https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2020.0004 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Lau ES, Binek A, Parker SJ, Shah SH, Zanni MV, Van Eyk JE, Ho JE. Sexual dimorphism in cardiovascular biomarkers: clinical and research implications. Circ Res. 2022;130(4):578–92. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319916 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources