Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0295243.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295243. eCollection 2023.

How exposure to patient narratives affects stereotyped choices of primary care clinicians

Affiliations

How exposure to patient narratives affects stereotyped choices of primary care clinicians

Deepon Bhaumik et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In this paper, we examine whether patient narratives alter the impact of stereotyping on choice of primary care clinicians: in this case, the common presumption that female doctors will be more attentive to empathic relationships with patients. 1052 individuals were selected from a nationally representative Internet panel to participate in a survey experiment. Participants were given performance data about 12 fictitious primary care physicians, including a randomized set of narrative feedback from patients. We compared the choice of clinician made by participants who value bedside manner and were exposed to narratives in the experiment, compared to those valuing bedside manner who had not had this exposure. We estimated multivariate logistic regressions to assess whether exposure to patient comments that "disrupt" stereotypes influenced choice of physicians. Participants who saw patient comments and had previously reported caring about bedside manner had a 67% higher odds of choosing a female physician than those participants that did not see a patient comments, controlling for the content of the narratives themselves. When participants were exposed to patient comments that disrupt gendered stereotypes, they had a 40% lower odds of choosing a female physician. Simple exposure to patient narratives that do not clearly disrupt gendered stereotypes increased the likelihood of choosing a female clinician by priming attention to relational aspects of care. However, when the content of a sufficient proportion of patient comments runs counter stereotypes, even a minority of narratives is sufficient to disrupt gendered-expectations and alter choices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram of the SelectMD 2.0 provider choice experiment.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Performance rating displays seen by participants on the “Select MD” website.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Comments displays seen by participants on the “Select MD” website.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Odds of choosing a female physician by the proportion of stereotype disrupter comments.

References

    1. Schlesinger M. Choice cuts: parsing policymakers’ pursuit of patient empowerment from an individual perspective. Health Econ Policy Law. 2010;5(3):365–387. doi: 10.1017/S174413311000006X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brekke KR, Gravelle H, Siciliani L, Straume OR. Patient choice, mobility and competition among health care providers. Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 2014;12:1–26. doi: 10.1007/978-88-470-5480-6_1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller BJ, Mandelberg MC, Griffith NC, Ehrenfeld JM. (2020). Price Transparency: Empowering Patient Choice and Promoting Provider Competition. Journal of medical systems, 44(4), [80]. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01553-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aggarwal A, Lewis D, Mason M, Sullivan R, van der Meulen J. Patient Mobility for Elective Secondary Health Care Services in Response to Patient Choice Policies: A Systematic Review. Med Care Res Rev. 2017;74(4):379–403. doi: 10.1177/1077558716654631 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siciliani L, Chalkley M, Gravelle H. Policies towards hospital and GP competition in five European countries. Health Policy. 2017;121(2):103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.11.011 - DOI - PubMed