Electrocardiographic deep learning for predicting post-procedural mortality: a model development and validation study
- PMID: 38065778
- DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00220-0
Electrocardiographic deep learning for predicting post-procedural mortality: a model development and validation study
Abstract
Background: Preoperative risk assessments used in clinical practice are insufficient in their ability to identify risk for postoperative mortality. Deep-learning analysis of electrocardiography can identify hidden risk markers that can help to prognosticate postoperative mortality. We aimed to develop a prognostic model that accurately predicts postoperative mortality in patients undergoing medical procedures and who had received preoperative electrocardiographic diagnostic testing.
Methods: In a derivation cohort of preoperative patients with available electrocardiograms (ECGs) from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Los Angeles, CA, USA) between Jan 1, 2015 and Dec 31, 2019, a deep-learning algorithm was developed to leverage waveform signals to discriminate postoperative mortality. We randomly split patients (8:1:1) into subsets for training, internal validation, and final algorithm test analyses. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values in the hold-out test dataset and in two external hospital cohorts and compared with the established Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) score. The primary outcome was post-procedural mortality across three health-care systems.
Findings: 45 969 patients had a complete ECG waveform image available for at least one 12-lead ECG performed within the 30 days before the procedure date (59 975 inpatient procedures and 112 794 ECGs): 36 839 patients in the training dataset, 4549 in the internal validation dataset, and 4581 in the internal test dataset. In the held-out internal test cohort, the algorithm discriminates mortality with an AUC value of 0·83 (95% CI 0·79-0·87), surpassing the discrimination of the RCRI score with an AUC of 0·67 (0·61-0·72). The algorithm similarly discriminated risk for mortality in two independent US health-care systems, with AUCs of 0·79 (0·75-0·83) and 0·75 (0·74-0·76), respectively. Patients determined to be high risk by the deep-learning model had an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 8·83 (5·57-13·20) for postoperative mortality compared with an unadjusted OR of 2·08 (0·77-3·50) for postoperative mortality for RCRI scores of more than 2. The deep-learning algorithm performed similarly for patients undergoing cardiac surgery (AUC 0·85 [0·77-0·92]), non-cardiac surgery (AUC 0·83 [0·79-0·88]), and catheterisation or endoscopy suite procedures (AUC 0·76 [0·72-0·81]).
Interpretation: A deep-learning algorithm interpreting preoperative ECGs can improve discrimination of postoperative mortality. The deep-learning algorithm worked equally well for risk stratification of cardiac surgeries, non-cardiac surgeries, and catheterisation laboratory procedures, and was validated in three independent health-care systems. This algorithm can provide additional information to clinicians making the decision to perform medical procedures and stratify the risk of future complications.
Funding: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests DO reports support from the National Institute of Health (NIH; NHLBI R00HL157421) and Alexion, and consulting or honoraria for lectures from EchoIQ, Ultromics, Pfizer, InVision, the Korean Society of Echo, and the Japanese Society of Echo. JWH reports funding from the National Science Foundation (DGE-1656518). PE reports research support from the NIH (T32HL007854-21) and serves on the American College of Cardiology Innovation Council. BC reports consulting from Alnylam, Cardurion, Corvia, CVRX, Cytokinetics, Intellia, and Rocket. TP reports stock in Abbot and Baxter, and research support from the American Heart Association, Eido, Pfizer, Edwards, and the New York Academy of Medicine. JHC reports research funding from NIH/National Institute of Aging (AI17812101), NIH/National Institute on Drug Abuse (UG1DA015815-CTN-0136), AIMI-HAI Partnership, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (20211260), Google (SPO136094), American Heart Association, and Clinical and Translational Sciences Awards Program by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (R56LM013365); is a co-founder of Reaction Explorer; and receives consulting fees from Sutton Pierce and Younker Hyde MacFarlane. MP reports research support from the NIH (HL136390), patents for ECG-based cardiac arrhythmia detection (WO2014205310A3), and consulting fees from Apple, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, QALY, Johnson and Johnson, and Bristol Myers Squibb. CMA reports support from NIH (HL165840), consulting fees from Medtronic, Novartis, Illumina, and Medtronic, and participation in advisory boards for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Element Science; and is a trustee on the board for the Heart Rhythm Society. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Expanding electrocardiogram abilities for postoperative mortality prediction with deep learning.Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Jan;6(1):e4-e5. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00230-3. Epub 2023 Dec 7. Lancet Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 38065779 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials