Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;48(1):29-35.
doi: 10.1007/s40596-023-01916-0. Epub 2023 Dec 8.

What Can You Learn About Psychiatry Programs from Their Website? A Content Evaluation for Potential Applicants

Austin G Armstrong  1 , Kenneth W Fraser  2 , Shelby N Nix  2 , Rosalee Zackula  2 , Rachel Brown  2 , Matthew Macaluso  3
Affiliations

What Can You Learn About Psychiatry Programs from Their Website? A Content Evaluation for Potential Applicants

Austin G Armstrong et al. Acad Psychiatry. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: This project aimed to assess the information contained on general psychiatry program websites and identify common themes that may be useful and informative for residency applicants.

Methods: A survey study design was used to evaluate all US general psychiatry program websites as listed in the FREIDA database. The evaluation form included 44 binary (yes or no) items. Two reviewers rated each item on all program websites between September 2021 and January 2022. Item discrepancies were settled by a third reviewer. Fisher's exact tests evaluated differences between geographic regions and program types. Multidimensional scaling and Rasch modeling were conducted to examine clustering and the probability of items reported on program websites.

Results: A total of 285 websites were identified; 13 were excluded. Internal consistency was high among reviewers, Cronbach's Alpha = 0.927; κ = 0.863. Websites varied considerably in quality. Significant inconsistent reporting was observed by region for current residents' photos and alumni careers (fellowship/jobs); p<0.001. Program types varied regarding information about program faculty, which included significant differences for faculty photo, faculty research interest, and faculty research publications; p<0.001.

Conclusions: While inter-rater reliability was high, considerable variation among websites was observed. Residency programs could be improved by consistently reporting resident and faculty information. Results show that applicants may encounter issues finding pertinent information, as programs' FREIDA link did not direct the user to the residency program website two-thirds of the time.

Keywords: Graduate medical education; Recruitment; Residency program website; Virtual.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Benson NM, Stickle TR, Raszka WV Jr. Going “fourth” from medical school: fourth-year medical students’ perspectives on the fourth year of medical school. Acad Med. 2015;90(10):1386–93. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walling A, Nilsen K, Callaway P, Grothusen J, Gillenwater C, King S, et al. Student expenses in residency interviewing. Kans J Med. 2017;10(3):1–15. - PubMed
    1. Callaway P, Melhado T, Walling A, Groskurth J. Financial and time burdens for medical students interviewing for residency. Fam Med. 2017;49(2):137–40. - PubMed
    1. National Resident Matching Program. 2021 Applicant and program director survey findings: impact of the virtual experience on the transition to residency. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Research-Brief-Virtual-E... . Accessed 9 Aug 2023.
    1. Weissbart SJ, Kim SJ, Feinn RS, Stock JA. Relationship between the number of residency applications and the yearly match rate: time to start thinking about an application limit? J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(1):81–5. - DOI - PubMed - PMC