Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 4;24(23):17106.
doi: 10.3390/ijms242317106.

Enhancement of Radiation Sensitivity by Cathepsin L Suppression in Colon Carcinoma Cells

Affiliations

Enhancement of Radiation Sensitivity by Cathepsin L Suppression in Colon Carcinoma Cells

Ramadan F Abdelaziz et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Cancer is one of the main causes of death globally. Radiotherapy/Radiation therapy (RT) is one of the most common and effective cancer treatments. RT utilizes high-energy radiation to damage the DNA of cancer cells, leading to their death or impairing their proliferation. However, radiation resistance remains a significant challenge in cancer treatment, limiting its efficacy. Emerging evidence suggests that cathepsin L (cath L) contributes to radiation resistance through multiple mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the role of cath L, a member of the cysteine cathepsins (caths) in radiation sensitivity, and the potential reduction in radiation resistance by using the specific cath L inhibitor (Z-FY(tBu)DMK) or by knocking out cath L with CRISPR/Cas9 in colon carcinoma cells (caco-2). Cells were treated with different doses of radiation (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10), dose rate 3 Gy/min. In addition, the study conducted protein expression analysis by western blot and immunofluorescence assay, cytotoxicity MTT, and apoptosis assays. The results demonstrated that cath L was upregulated in response to radiation treatment, compared to non-irradiated cells. In addition, inhibiting or knocking out cath L led to increased radiosensitivity in contrast to the negative control group. This may indicate a reduced ability of cancer cells to recover from radiation-induced DNA damage, resulting in enhanced cell death. These findings highlight the possibility of targeting cath L as a therapeutic strategy to enhance the effectiveness of RT. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and to assess the translational implications of cath L knockout in clinical settings. Ultimately, these findings may contribute to the development of novel treatment approaches for improving outcomes of RT in cancer patients.

Keywords: cancer; cath L; colon carcinoma; inhibitor; knockout; radiation dose; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Assessment of cath L expression under varying radiation doses. (A) Western blot was performed to investigate the regulation differences. (B) The cellular cath L levels were compared with and without radiation treatment, and statistical analysis was performed using the t-test with GraphPad Prism software. The results indicated a highly significant difference (*** p < 0.001), and the graphs represent the mean ± standard error (SE) with a sample size of N = 5. (0 Gy = Control).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cath L localization in irradiated and non-irradiated (control) caco-2 cells (63× magnification). Application of anti-cath L antibody (green) shows the lysosomal and membrane-bound cath L localization, LysoTracker red for lysosomal staining and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) visualizes nuclear DNA (blue) in fixed cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Impact of radiation treatment on the labeling of cysteine cathepsins’ active sites using DCG04. (A) Active-site labeling with DCG04 was carried out, and protein samples underwent electrophoresis and subsequent western blotting using streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase. (B) The cellular content of procathepsin B/L, heavy chain-form cath B/L, and mature form (two-chain form) of cath B/L in irradiated caco-2 cells labeled with DCG-04 bands was compared to cellular content from control cells labeled with DCG-04 only, non-significant (n.s). The data underwent analysis using a two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc analysis. Statistical calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism. The results indicated a highly significant difference (*** p < 0.001), and the graphs represent the mean ± standard error (SE) with a sample size of N = 5. (0 Gy = Control).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Avidin pull-down experiment of cysteine cathepsins with and without radiation treatment. (A) Conjugated proteins to avidin sepharose beads were subjected to SDS-PAGE and western blotting with antibodies specific to human cath L. (B) Ratio of cellular contents of cath L with and without radiation treatment. The data were analyzed by t-test and statistics using GraphPad Prism. *** p < 0.001. Graphs are shown as mean ± SE, N = 5. (0 Gy= Control).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cytotoxicity analysis of treated cells by radiation and a cath L inhibitor, compared to untreated cells. Statistical analysis was carried out using a t-test with GraphPad Prism, and the results indicated significant differences (*** p < 0.001), non-significant (n.s). The graphs represent the mean values along with the standard error (SE), and the study had a sample size of N = 8. (0 Gy = Control).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Examination of cath L expression in both control and cath L knockout cells.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Evaluating the effect of cath L knockout on cellular toxicity in both irradiated and non-irradiated cells. Statistical analysis was performed using a t-test with GraphPad Prism, revealing a highly significant difference (*** p < 0.001), non-significant (n.s). The graphs depict the mean values along with the standard error (SE), and the study had a sample size of N = 8. (0 Gy = Control).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Assessing the influence of cath L inhibition on apoptosis rates in cells exposed and non-exposed to ionizing radiation via caspase 3/7 activity assay. The data underwent analysis using a two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc analysis, revealing significance levels (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; N = 4), non-significant (n.s), (0 Gy = Control). Statistical calculations were carried out using GraphPad Prism.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Z-Phe-Tyr(tBu)-diazomethylketone is an irreversible cathepsin L inhibitor, and this compound is commonly utilized as a selective inhibitor for cath L. It is a modified peptide derivative consisting of the amino acids phenylalanine (Phe) and tyrosine (Tyr), along with a diazomethylketone functional group attached to the tyrosine residue. The tBu abbreviation indicates the presence of a tert-butyl group, which enhances stability and influences the compound’s properties. Chemical Formula: C31H34N4O5.
Figure 10
Figure 10
E-64 is an irreversible, potent, and highly selective broad spectrum cysteine proteinase and calpain activation inhibitor. N-[N-(L-3-Trans-carboxirane-2-carbonyl)-L-leucyl]-agmatine. Formula: C15H27N5O5.

References

    1. Ferlay J., Colombet M., Soerjomataram I., Parkin D.M., Piñeros M., Znaor A., Bray F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int. J. Cancer. 2021;149:778–789. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnold M., Sierra M.S., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66:683–691. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nardone V., D’Ippolito E., Grassi R., Sangiovanni A., Gagliardi F., De Marco G., Menditti V.S., D’Ambrosio L., Cioce F., Boldrini L., et al. Non-Oncological Radiotherapy: A Review of Modern Approaches. J. Pers. Med. 2022;12:1677. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101677. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources