Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 3:101:skad404.
doi: 10.1093/jas/skad404.

Effects of a novel direct-fed microbial on growth performance, carcass characteristics, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal morphology of beef feedlot steers

Affiliations

Effects of a novel direct-fed microbial on growth performance, carcass characteristics, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal morphology of beef feedlot steers

Tosha S Opheim et al. J Anim Sci. .

Abstract

The effects of a novel direct-fed microbial (DFM) on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, digestibility, ruminal morphology, and volatile fatty acid (VFA) profile of finishing steers were evaluated. Single-source Angus-crossbred yearling steers (n = 144; initial body weight (BW) = 371 ± 19 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design. Steers were blocked by initial BW and randomly assigned to treatments (12 pens/treatment; 4 steers/pen). Treatments included (A) CONTROL (no DFM, tylosin, or monensin, (B) MONTY (monensin sodium [330 mg/animal-daily] and tylosin phosphate [90 mg/animal-daily]), and (C) MONPRO (monensin sodium [same as previous] and Lactobacillus salivarius L28 [1 × 106 CFU/animal-daily]). Treatments were included in a steam-flaked corn-based finisher diet offered once daily using a clean-bunk management for ~149 d. The digestibility assessment was performed from days 70 to 74. Ruminal fluid and rumen tissue samples were collected at the slaughter for VFA profile and papillae morphology analyses, respectively. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with pen serving as the experimental unit, treatment as fixed effect, and BW block as random effect. Steers offered MONPRO had on average 5.3% less (P < 0.01) dry matter intake (9.56 kg/d) compared with either CONTROL (10.16 kg/d) or MONTY (9.96 kg/d). The carcass-adjusted final BW (613 kg; P = 0.23), overall average daily gain (1.64 kg/d; P = 0.23), and gain-efficiency (0.165; P = 0.61) were not affected by treatments. Steers offered CONTROL had greater (P < 0.01) marbling score and tended (P = 0.06) to have less carcasses grading Select and tended (P = 0.10) to have more carcasses grading Upper-Choice, while other carcass characteristics and liver-abscesses were not affected (P ≥ 0.23) by treatments. The digestibility of nutrients (P ≥ 0.13) and the ruminal VFA profile (P ≥ 0.12) were not affected by treatments. Steers offered MONPRO tended (P = 0.09) to have 16% greater average papillae number compared to other treatments. Yearlings offered finishing diets containing L. salivarius L28 plus monensin did not affect growth performance, digestibility, or ruminal VFA, but reduced feed intake. Carcass quality was negatively affected by treatments, while animals consuming L. salivarius L28 and monensin tended to improve ruminal morphology. Current findings in ruminal morphology and feed intake may warrant further assessment of diets containing L. salivarius L28 on beef cattle food safety aspects.

Keywords: beef steers; carcass; direct-fed microbial; morphology; performance.

Plain language summary

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern to public health and medically important antibiotics have been listed in the Veterinary Feed Directive. Nutritional technologies, such as direct-fed microbials, are being increasingly studied for the development of an effective use on beef cattle production systems. The newly isolated strain of Lactobacillus salivarius L28 has demonstrated pathogenic inhibition of Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes on in vitro assessments. The potential benefits have warranted the exploration of L. salivarius L28 in a feedlot setting. Single-source Angus-crossbred yearling steers were offered steam-flaked corn-based finishing diets containing no feed additive, or either a combination of tylosin plus monensin or L. salivarius L28 plus monensin. Steers offered L. salivarius L28 plus monensin consumed 5.3% less feed compared with other treatments, while other growth performance variables and the digestibility of nutrients were not affected. Carcasses from cattle supplemented with monensin had slightly lower carcass quality grades than those not supplemented with monensin. Lactobacillus salivarius L28 plus monensin tended to improve steers ruminal morphology. Current findings may warrant further food safety assessments when cattle are offered diets containing L. salivarius L28.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Brashears and Nightingale are co-founders and own shares of NexGen Innovations, LLC and Dr. Ballou is a co-owner of MB Nutritional Sciences, LLC and their participation is governed by a management plan in place at Texas Tech University to mitigate the risks from conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Ruminal morphology of yearling steers offered CONTROL (no feed additive), MONTY (monensin and tylosin), or MONPRO (monensin and L. salivarius L28) on a steam-flaked corn-based finishing diet, in which (A) average papillae number, n/cm2; (B) average papillae area, cm2; (C) absorptive surface area, cm2/fragment-cm2; and (D) papillae absorptive area, % of total surface area. A tendency (P = 0.09) was observed for steers offered MONPRO to have a 15.8% greater average papillae number (A) compared to CONTROL and MONTY, while dietary treatments did not affect (P ≥ 0.26) the ruminal average papillae area (B), absorptive surface area (C), and papillae absorptive area (D).

References

    1. AOAC. 2005. Official method of analysis. 18th ed. Washington DC: Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists.
    1. Ayala, D. I., Cook P. W., Campos D. L., Brashears M. M., den Bakker H., and Nightingale K. K... 2017. Draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus salivarius L28 isolated from ground beef. Genome Announc. 5:e00955-17. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00955-17 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bach, A., Iglesias C., and Devant M... 2007. Daily rumen pH pattern of loose-housed dairy cattle as affected by feeding pattern and live yeast supplementation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 136:146–153. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.09.011 - DOI
    1. Basarab, J. A., Price M. A., Aalhus J. L., Okine E. K., Snelling W. M., and Lyle K. L... 2003. Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83:189–204. doi:10.4141/a02-065 - DOI
    1. Beauchemin, K. A., Yang Q. Z., Morgavi D. P., Ghorbani G. R., and Kautz W... 2003. Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials and yeast on site and extent of digestion, blood chemistry, and subclinical ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 81:1628–1640. doi:10.2527/2003.8161628x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources