Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Feb;41(2):649-658.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02745-1. Epub 2023 Dec 9.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Recombinant Factor IX Albumin Fusion Protein Versus Recombinant Factor IX Fc Fusion Protein for Weekly Prophylactic Treatment of Hemophilia B

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Recombinant Factor IX Albumin Fusion Protein Versus Recombinant Factor IX Fc Fusion Protein for Weekly Prophylactic Treatment of Hemophilia B

Benoit Guillet et al. Adv Ther. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Prophylactic treatment of hemophilia B with recombinant factor IX (rFIX) molecules with enhanced pharmacokinetics including rIX-FP (albutrepenonacog alfa; Idelvion©) and rFIXFc (eftrenonacog alfa; Alprolix©) have commonly been used in the clinic. In the absence of head-to-head comparative trials, the aim of this study was to estimate the efficacy of rIX-FP versus rFIXFc using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs).

Methods: MAIC analyses leveraged individual patient data from the PROLONG-9FP trial and published summary-level data from the B-LONG trial for subjects who received weekly prophylaxis regimens. Individual patient data were used to assign weights and balance subjects from PROLONG-9FP with subjects from B-LONG on baseline disease severity, age, prior FIX regimen, and body mass index (BMI). Six efficacy outcomes were analyzed including annualized bleeding rate (ABR), annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR), annualized joint bleeding rate (AjBR), and the proportion of subjects without bleeding events (for total, spontaneous, and joint bleeding events).

Results: After adjustment for baseline disease severity, age, prior FIX regimen, and BMI, rIX-FP was associated with a statistically significant decrease in AsBR (rate ratio [RR] 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22, 0.82; P = 0.0107), and the proportion of patients without bleeding events (odds ratio [OR] 3.24; 95% CI 1.41, 7.45; P = 0.0057), spontaneous bleeding events (OR 3.47; 95% CI 1.56, 7.73; P = 0.0023), and joint bleeding events (OR 2.41; 95% CI 1.10, 5.26; P = 0.0274) compared with rFIXFc. Prophylactic treatment with rIX-FP was also associated with a numerically lower ABR (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.32, 1.75; P = 0.5095) and AjBR (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.37, 1.82; P = 0.6178).

Conclusion: The MAICs demonstrated that weekly prophylaxis treatment of severe hemophilia B with rIX-FP resulted in favorable efficacy outcomes as compared to rFIXFc. These findings suggest rIX-FP may offer improved clinical benefits over rFIXFc.

Keywords: Efficacy; Hemophilia B; Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons; Prophylactic treatment; Recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein; Recombinant factor IX albumin fusion protein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Benoît Guillet has been a consultant for Baxter/Baxalta/Shire/Takeda, BioMarin CSL Behring, Laboratoire Francais du Fractionnement et Des Biotechnologies, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Roche-Chugaï and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum. Songkai Yan, Douglass Drelich, and Radovan Tomic are employees of CSL Behring. Becky Hooper and Jason Steenkamp are employees of EVERSANA who received funding from CSL Behring for conducting the statistical analyses that informed this study. Maria Elisa Mancuso has acted as a consultant for Bayer, BioMarin, CSL Behring, Grifols, Kedrion Biopharma, Laboratoire Francais du Fractionnement et Des Biotechnologies, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Spark Therapeutics, Takeda, and uniQure.

References

    1. Berntorp E, Fischer K, Hart DP, et al. Haemophilia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00278-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oldenburg J. Optimal treatment strategies for hemophilia: achievements and limitations of current prophylactic regimens. Blood. 2015;125(13):2038–2044. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-528414. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castaman G. The benefits of prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia B. Expert Rev Hematol. 2018;11(8):673–683. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2018.1489719. - DOI - PubMed
    1. von Mackensen S, Eldar-Lissai A, Auguste P, von Maltzahn R, Yu R, Wyrwich KW. Measurement properties of the Haem-A-QoL in haemophilia clinical trials. Haemophilia. 2017;23(3):383–391. doi: 10.1111/hae.13140. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hacker MR, Geraghty S, Manco-Johnson M. Barriers to compliance with prophylaxis therapy in haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2001;7(4):392–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2001.00534.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources