The Comparison Between 3.5- and 4.5-mm T-plates for Management of the Patients with Schatzker Type II Tibial Plateau Fractures that Referred to our Emergency Department: A Clinical Trial
- PMID: 38073722
- PMCID: PMC10699211
- DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_40_23
The Comparison Between 3.5- and 4.5-mm T-plates for Management of the Patients with Schatzker Type II Tibial Plateau Fractures that Referred to our Emergency Department: A Clinical Trial
Abstract
Background: Tibial plateau fractures have become more frequent in recent years. The most prevalent Schatzker classification is type II, which is a lateral tibial plateau fracture with depression. Our null hypothesis was that the 3.5 T-plate and the 4.5 T-plate have no difference in the management of patients with Schatzker type II tibial plateau fractures.
Materials and methods: The current study is a clinical trial that was conducted on patients with tibial plateau fractures. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was this study's main outcome. Tourniquet time (TT) and patient quality of life using the 36-item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) were secondary goals of the outcomes measurement study. VAS measured pain. Among 176 patients, 89 and 87 of cases underwent surgical treatment with 3.5-mm (group A) and 4.5-mm (group B) T-plate, respectively. The data were entered into SPSS software (version 25, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) and analyzed.
Results: In our study, we evaluated 176 patients with a mean age of 34.8 ± 15.2 years. Functional and clinical KSS scores were similar between the two groups throughout follow-up (P > 0.05). Regarding the other variables of VAS, TT, SF-36 physical function, and SF-36 mental health, no significant difference was observed between the two groups, and the two groups had similar averages in terms of these indicators (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: According to the results, both plates had the appropriate functional outcomes in patients with split depression tibial plateau fracture.
Keywords: Bone plates; Schatzker classification; fracture; internal fixation; tibial plateau.
Copyright: © 2023 Advanced Biomedical Research.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Clinical Comparison of the "Windowing" Technique and the "Open Book" Technique in Schatzker Type II Tibial Plateau Fracture.Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct;14(10):2553-2562. doi: 10.1111/os.13450. Epub 2022 Sep 2. Orthop Surg. 2022. PMID: 36056570 Free PMC article.
-
Comparable outcomes with intramedullary nail and plate constructs for Schatzker VI tibial plateau fractures.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul;33(5):1653-1661. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03326-8. Epub 2022 Jul 8. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023. PMID: 35802263
-
Comparison of the results of the synthesis of Schatzker II and III tibial plateau fractures by screwing versus plate.Int Orthop. 2023 Aug;47(8):2073-2083. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05849-z. Epub 2023 Jun 8. Int Orthop. 2023. PMID: 37289239
-
Patient function continues to improve over the first five years following tibial plateau fracture managed by open reduction and internal fixation.Bone Joint J. 2020 May;102-B(5):632-637. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B5.BJJ-2019-1385.R1. Bone Joint J. 2020. PMID: 32349595
-
Meta-analysis shows that highly comminuted bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated by single lateral locking plate give similar outcomes as dual plate fixation.Int Orthop. 2016 Oct;40(10):2129-2141. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3157-8. Epub 2016 Mar 23. Int Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27008456 Review.
References
-
- Rudran B, Little C, Wiik A, Logishetty K. Tibial plateau fracture: Anatomy, diagnosis and management. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2020;81:1–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources