Evaluating the Effectiveness of Conventional Prostheses Against Dual-Mobility Prostheses in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Two Separate Groups of Patients: A Clinical Trial Study
- PMID: 38073750
- PMCID: PMC10699230
- DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_108_23
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Conventional Prostheses Against Dual-Mobility Prostheses in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Two Separate Groups of Patients: A Clinical Trial Study
Abstract
Background: Femoral neck fracture is a common posttraumatic injury in the elderly. Currently, orthopedic surgeons conducting total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip fractures have various prosthetic alternatives. Dual-mobility cup THA is recommended for hip fracture patients to reduce prosthesis dislocation. Therefore, the goal of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of conventional prostheses against dual-mobility prostheses in treating femoral neck fractures in two groups of patients.
Materials and methods: The current clinical investigation involved patients with femoral neck fractures. Among approved 84 patients, 44 and 40 were undergoing conventional THA (group A) and dual-mobility THA (group B), respectively. Patients were observed regularly after surgeries, and the same measurements were performed. The data were assembled and entered into SPSS software (version 25, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and analyzed. In all analyses, a P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Eighty-four cases with an average age of 63.97 years were evaluated. In postoperative follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of Harris hip score, SF-36, and infection (P > 0.05). However, patients who received conventional implants had more dislocation postoperatively (P = 0.045). Regarding the rehabilitation costs, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups, so the group using the conventional implants incurred a higher cost (P = 0.041).
Conclusion: According to the results, both dual mobility and conventional implants had optimal functional outcomes in patients with femoral neck fractures.
Keywords: Femoral fractures; hip prosthesis; total hip arthroplasty.
Copyright: © 2023 Advanced Biomedical Research.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparative study of total hip arthroplasties with dual mobility cups versus hemiarthroplasties in management of femoral neck fractures: Survival and dislocation rate at 5 years of follow-up?Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Feb;108(1):103098. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103098. Epub 2021 Oct 12. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022. PMID: 34624538
-
Comparing Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Neck of Femur Fractures in Elderly Patients Utilizing Dual Mobility Cups and Conventional Implants: A Single Center Retrospective Study of 129 Patients.Indian J Orthop. 2022 Nov 27;57(1):62-70. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00759-5. eCollection 2023 Jan. Indian J Orthop. 2022. PMID: 36660481 Free PMC article.
-
THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):72-81. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001447. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021. PMID: 32876424 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility components in patients with a femoral neck fracture.Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul;102-B(7):811-821. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1486.R1. Bone Joint J. 2020. PMID: 32600134
-
Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.Bone Joint J. 2020 Nov;102-B(11):1457-1466. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-0610.R2. Bone Joint J. 2020. PMID: 33135437
Cited by
-
Outcomes of dual mobility versus conventional total hip arthroplasty for patients with femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis including registry data.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 23;20(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05764-6. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40270012 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Singh I, Hooton K, Edwards C, Lewis B, Anwar A, Johansen A. Inpatient hip fractures: Understanding and addressing the risk of this common injury. Age Ageing. 2020;49:481–6. - PubMed
-
- Veronese N, Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury. 2018;49:1458–60. - PubMed
-
- Gausden EB, Cross WW, 3rd, Mabry TM, Pagnano MW, Berry DJ, Abdel MP. Total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: What are the contemporary reasons for failure? J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:S272–6. - PubMed
-
- HEALTH Investigators. Bhandari M, Einhorn TA, Guyatt G, Schemitsch EH, Zura RD, et al. Total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2199–208. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources