Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 6:9:20552076231219113.
doi: 10.1177/20552076231219113. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

Integrating environmental considerations in digital health technology assessment and procurement: Stakeholders' perspectives

Affiliations

Integrating environmental considerations in digital health technology assessment and procurement: Stakeholders' perspectives

Hassane Alami et al. Digit Health. .

Abstract

Background: Digital health technologies (DHTs) are promoted as means to reduce the environmental impact of healthcare systems. However, a growing literature is shedding light on the highly polluting nature of the digital industry and how it exacerbates health inequalities. Thus, the environmental footprint of DHTs should be considered when assessing their overall value to healthcare systems. The objectives of this article are to: (1) explore stakeholders' perspectives on integrating the environmental impacts of DHTs in assessment and procurement practices; (2) identify the factors enabling or constraining the operationalisation of such a change; and (3) encourage a constructive dialogue on how environmental issues fit within healthcare systems' push for more DHTs.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 stakeholders involved in DHTs in a large Canadian academic healthcare centre. Data were collected and analysed through a mixed deductive-inductive process using a framework derived from diffusion of innovations theories.

Results: The integration of the environmental impact of DHTs in assessment and procurement is contingent upon key micro-meso-macrosystemic factors that either enable or constrain changes in practices and processes. Innovation (micro) factors include stakeholders' recognition of the environmental issue and the extent to which it is feasible for them to address the environmental impact of DHTs. Organisational (meso) factors include the organisation's culture, leadership, policies, and practices, as well as the expertise and professional skillsets available. Finally, external (macro) factors include political and regulatory (e.g., national strategy, laws, standards, norms), economic (e.g., business models, public procurement), and professional and scientific factors (e.g., evidence, methodologies, clinical guidelines).

Conclusion: Considering the environmental impact of DHTs depends on micro-meso-macrosystemic factors involving a variety of stakeholders and levels of governance, sometimes with divergent or even antagonistic objectives and expectations. It highlights the importance of better understanding the complexity inherent in the environmental shift in healthcare.

Keywords: Digital health; climate change; environment; health technology assessment; healthcare system; public procurement; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. He JK. Global low-carbon transition and China's response strategies. Adv Clim Change Res 2016; 7: 204–212.
    1. Satola D, Wiberg AH, Singh M, et al. Comparative review of international approaches to net-zero buildings: knowledge-sharing initiative to develop design strategies for greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Energy Sustain Dev 2022; 71: 291–306.
    1. Feng CC, Chang KF, Lin JX, et al. Toward green transition in the post Paris Agreement era: the case of Taiwan. Energy Policy 2022; 165: 112996.
    1. Lee JH, Woo J. Green new deal policy of South Korea: policy innovation for a sustainability transition. Sustainability 2020; 12: 10191.
    1. Hammond DR, Brady TF. Critical minerals for green energy transition: a United States perspective. Int J Min Reclam Environ 2022; 36: 624–641.

LinkOut - more resources