Integrating environmental considerations in digital health technology assessment and procurement: Stakeholders' perspectives
- PMID: 38074337
- PMCID: PMC10704940
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076231219113
Integrating environmental considerations in digital health technology assessment and procurement: Stakeholders' perspectives
Abstract
Background: Digital health technologies (DHTs) are promoted as means to reduce the environmental impact of healthcare systems. However, a growing literature is shedding light on the highly polluting nature of the digital industry and how it exacerbates health inequalities. Thus, the environmental footprint of DHTs should be considered when assessing their overall value to healthcare systems. The objectives of this article are to: (1) explore stakeholders' perspectives on integrating the environmental impacts of DHTs in assessment and procurement practices; (2) identify the factors enabling or constraining the operationalisation of such a change; and (3) encourage a constructive dialogue on how environmental issues fit within healthcare systems' push for more DHTs.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 stakeholders involved in DHTs in a large Canadian academic healthcare centre. Data were collected and analysed through a mixed deductive-inductive process using a framework derived from diffusion of innovations theories.
Results: The integration of the environmental impact of DHTs in assessment and procurement is contingent upon key micro-meso-macrosystemic factors that either enable or constrain changes in practices and processes. Innovation (micro) factors include stakeholders' recognition of the environmental issue and the extent to which it is feasible for them to address the environmental impact of DHTs. Organisational (meso) factors include the organisation's culture, leadership, policies, and practices, as well as the expertise and professional skillsets available. Finally, external (macro) factors include political and regulatory (e.g., national strategy, laws, standards, norms), economic (e.g., business models, public procurement), and professional and scientific factors (e.g., evidence, methodologies, clinical guidelines).
Conclusion: Considering the environmental impact of DHTs depends on micro-meso-macrosystemic factors involving a variety of stakeholders and levels of governance, sometimes with divergent or even antagonistic objectives and expectations. It highlights the importance of better understanding the complexity inherent in the environmental shift in healthcare.
Keywords: Digital health; climate change; environment; health technology assessment; healthcare system; public procurement; sustainability.
© The Author(s) 2023.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the Value of Provider-Facing Digital Health Technologies Used in Chronic Disease Management: Toward a Value Framework Based on Multistakeholder Perceptions.Med Decis Making. 2024 Jan;44(1):28-41. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231206803. Epub 2023 Oct 26. Med Decis Making. 2024. PMID: 37882333 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding the integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare organisations and systems through the NASSS framework: a qualitative study in a leading Canadian academic centre.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 3;24(1):701. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11112-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38831298 Free PMC article.
-
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis of the Use of Digital Health Technologies in Primary Health Care in the Sub-Saharan African Region: Qualitative Study.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 7;25:e45224. doi: 10.2196/45224. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37676721 Free PMC article.
-
"Sometimes I don't have a pulse … and I'm still alive!" Interviews with healthcare professionals to explore their experiences of and views on population-based digital health technologies.Digit Health. 2021 May 22;7:20552076211018366. doi: 10.1177/20552076211018366. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2021. PMID: 34104464 Free PMC article.
-
Application of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence Standards Framework for Digital Health Technologies in Assessing Mobile-Delivered Technologies for the Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Scoping Review.JMIR Diabetes. 2021 Feb 16;6(1):e23687. doi: 10.2196/23687. JMIR Diabetes. 2021. PMID: 33591278 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Leveraging stringency and lifecycle thinking to advance environmental sustainability in health technology regulation.Health Aff Sch. 2025 Feb 5;3(2):qxaf017. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf017. eCollection 2025 Feb. Health Aff Sch. 2025. PMID: 39916971 Free PMC article.
-
Under the Tech Umbrella: Assessing the Landscape of Telemedicine Innovations (Telemechron Study).Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 8;12(6):615. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060615. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38540579 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health Technology Assessment and Environmental Impact: A Scoping Review of State of Art and Future Perspective.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00984-7. Online ahead of print. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025. PMID: 40549262 Review.
-
To What Extent Can Digital Health Technologies Comply With the Principles of Responsible Innovation? Practice-and Policy-Oriented Research Insights Regarding an Organisational and Systemic Issue.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8061. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8061. Epub 2024 Oct 21. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024. PMID: 39620522 Free PMC article.
-
Aligning With the Goals of the Planetary Health Concept Regarding Ecological Sustainability and Digital Health: Scoping Review.J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 28;27:e71795. doi: 10.2196/71795. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40435494 Free PMC article.
References
-
- He JK. Global low-carbon transition and China's response strategies. Adv Clim Change Res 2016; 7: 204–212.
-
- Satola D, Wiberg AH, Singh M, et al. Comparative review of international approaches to net-zero buildings: knowledge-sharing initiative to develop design strategies for greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Energy Sustain Dev 2022; 71: 291–306.
-
- Feng CC, Chang KF, Lin JX, et al. Toward green transition in the post Paris Agreement era: the case of Taiwan. Energy Policy 2022; 165: 112996.
-
- Lee JH, Woo J. Green new deal policy of South Korea: policy innovation for a sustainability transition. Sustainability 2020; 12: 10191.
-
- Hammond DR, Brady TF. Critical minerals for green energy transition: a United States perspective. Int J Min Reclam Environ 2022; 36: 624–641.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources