Integrating Psychosocial Care into Orthopedic Settings: A Qualitative Study of Provider Perspectives
- PMID: 38074513
- PMCID: PMC10705025
- DOI: 10.5334/ijic.7579
Integrating Psychosocial Care into Orthopedic Settings: A Qualitative Study of Provider Perspectives
Abstract
Introduction: Approximately 50% of persons with orthopedic injuries experience psychosocial distress (e.g., depression, anxiety), which can predict chronic pain and disability. Offering psychosocial services in orthopedic settings can promote patient recovery. This study explores health care professionals' perceptions of and recommendations regarding integrated psychosocial care for orthopedic settings.
Methods: We conducted 18 semi-structured focus groups with 79 orthopedic health care professionals (e.g., surgeons, residents, nurses) across three Level I Trauma Centers. This secondary data analysis used the evidence-based Rainbow Model of Integrated Care framework to structure hybrid inductive-deductive qualitative data analysis.
Results: Orthopedic health care professionals identified potential benefits to psychosocial service integration across all dimensions of integration (i.e., clinical, professional, organizational, system, functional, and normative). These benefits included increased patient satisfaction with care, decreased burden on medical providers to manage patient distress, and decreased healthcare utilization costs. They also identified barriers (e.g., fast-paced clinic flow, mental health stigma) and offered recommendations to address barriers across dimensions of integration.
Conclusion: Integrated psychosocial care for orthopedic trauma patients has the potential to improve patient recovery and long-term physical and mental health outcomes. This work identifies strategies to inform the development and implementation of initiatives to integrate psychosocial services within orthopedic settings.
Keywords: Orthopedic trauma; integrated care; patient satisfaction; psychosocial services.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
References
-
- Haagsma JA, Graetz N, Bolliger I, Naghavi M, Higashi H, Mullany EC, et al. The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013. Inj Prev J Int Soc Child Adolesc Inj Prev. 2016. Feb; 22(1): 3–18. - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources