Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 12:7:128.
doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000128.1. eCollection 2018.

Assessment of Higher Ordered Thinking in Medical Education: Multiple Choice Questions and Modified Essay Questions

Affiliations

Assessment of Higher Ordered Thinking in Medical Education: Multiple Choice Questions and Modified Essay Questions

Arslaan Javaeed. MedEdPublish (2016). .

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Background: Multiple choice questions and Modified Essay Questions are two widely used methods of assessment in medical education. There is a lack of substantial evidence whether both forms of questions can assess higher ordered thinking or not. Objective: The objective of this paper is to assess the ability of a well-constructed Multiple-Choice Question (MCQ) to assess higher ordered thinking skills as compared to a Modified Essay Questions (MEQ) in medical education. Methods: The medical education literature was searched for articles related to comparison between multiple choice questions and modified essay questions, looking for credible evidence for using multiple choice questions for assessment of higher ordered thinking. Results and Conclusion: A well-structured MCQ has the capacity to assess higher ordered thinking and because of many other advantages that this format offers. Multiple choice questions should be considered as a preferable choice in undergraduate medical education as literature shows that different levels of Bloom's taxonomy can be assessed by this assessment format and its use for assessing only lower ordered thinking i.e. recall of knowledge, is not very convincing.

Keywords: assessment higher ordered thinking; modified essay questions; multiple choice questions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Levels of thinking in revised Bloom's Taxonomy.

References

    1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education, & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA;
    1. Anderson L. W. & Krathwohl D. R.(2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
    1. Bloom B. S. Engelhart M. D. & Committee of College and University Examiners. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. London: Longmans.
    1. Bridge P. D. Musial J. Frank R. Thomas R. & Sawilowsky S.(2003). Measurement practices: Methods for developing content-valid student examinations. Medical Teacher. 10.1080/0142159031000100337 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Case S. M. & Swanson D. B.(2002). Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. Director. 27(21),112.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources