A closer look at weight loss interventions in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 38076252
- PMCID: PMC10701393
- DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1204849
A closer look at weight loss interventions in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The major aims were to quantify patient weight loss using various approaches adminstered by a primary care provider for at least 6 months and to unveil relevant contextual factors that could improve patient weight loss on a long-term basis.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to December 5, 2022. COVIDENCE systematic review software was used to identify and abstract data, as well as assess data quality and risk of bias.
Results: Seven studies included 2,187 people with obesity testing (1) anti-obesity medication (AOM), (2) AOM, intensive lifestyle counseling + meal replacements, and (3) physician training to better counsel patients on intensive lifestyle modification. Substantial heterogeneity in the outcomes was observed, as well as bias toward lack of published studies showing no effect. The random effect model estimated a treatment effect for the aggregate efficacy of primary care interventions -3.54 kg (95% CI: -5.61 kg to -1.47 kg). Interventions that included a medication component (alone or as part of a multipronged intervention) achieved a greater weight reduction by -2.94 kg (p < 0.0001). In all interventions, efficacy declined with time (reduction in weight loss by 0.53 kg per 6 months, 95% CI: 0.04-1.0 kg).
Conclusion: Weight loss interventions administered by a primary care provider can lead to modest weight loss. Weight loss is approximately doubled if anti-obesity medication is part of the treatment. Nevertheless, attenuated weight loss over time underscores the need for long-term treatment.
Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ CRD4202121242344], identifier (CRD42021242344).
Keywords: electronic medical record (EMR); general practice; obesity; overweight; weight management.
Copyright © 2023 Perreault, Kramer, Smith, Schmidt and Argyropoulos.
Conflict of interest statement
LP has received personal fees for speaking and/or consulting from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Elli Lilly, Bayer, Neurobo, Medscape, WebMD and UpToDate. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures




References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity in the United States. Available at:www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html. (2016). (Accessed June 21, 2022).
-
- Milken Institute . Economic impact of excess weight now exceeds $17T. Available at:https://www.milkeninstitute.org/articles/economic-impact-excess-weight-n.... (2018). (Accessed June 21, 2022).
-
- World Health Organization . Obesity and overweight. Available at:https://www.who.int/topics/obesity/en/. (2018). (Accessed June 21, 2022)
-
- Crawford AG, Cote C, Couto J, Daskiran M, Gunnarsson C, Haas K, et al. . Prevalence of obesity, type II diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension in the United States: findings from the GE centricity electronic medical record database. Popul Health Manag. (2010) 13:151–61. doi: 10.1089/pop.2009.0039, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
-
- Garvey WT, Mechanick JI, Brett EM, Garber AJ, Hurley DL, Jastreboff AM, et al. . American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity. Endocr Pract. (2016) 22:1–203. doi: 10.4158/EP161365.GL, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources